 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-15, 12:13 PM
|
#1 |
|
No matter how good you are at something, there's always about a million people better than you
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 230
 |
post vs pages
Hey
I am building a kinda like a review site on a blog, and my question is, would it be better or worse making the reviews on the pages of a blog, or dosnt it matter to the se's if they are on posts or pages? Thanks |
|
|
|
2008-09-15, 01:00 PM
|
#2 |
|
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
SE's will care far more about how you organize your pages then how you build them. By that I mean internal linking structure and back links are more important.
I suspect posts would be easier for you to manage in the long run. 
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. 
|
|
|
|
|
2008-09-15, 06:30 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,773
 |
Quote:
The problem with posts is that they are dated. So from the index page standpoint (and a surfer who landed on your index page) a review done 6 months ago could be well outside the bounds getting too many clicks (buried 2-3 pages deep) Pages, on the otherhand, would tend to eat up a lot of sidebar real estate. You can look at feeds by niche in my sig, the right hand column is all page links. SE's aren't going to care whether its a post or a page but both offer interesting challenges in your attempts to get them noticed |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
