|
2006-10-30, 09:42 AM | #1 |
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Getting listed with free content
I am still very new to the business but I have been having some good success getting listed at LL's using free content from my sponsor. However there are some that are not listing me and I'm not getting any clues back from them why they refuse me. I'm wondering if I'm not getting listed at these sites because I don't have any purchased content. I don't think that the free content I have is overused, but maybe LL owners prefer to list sites that have bought content. I don't have a problem buying content but I have been using the free content because I want it to directly represent the sponsor I'm promoting (preferably using models that surfers will find on the site) and I can't really do this with purchased content. Am I being stupid trying to do this?. Does it make any difference if surfers find totally different models when they get to the sponsor site?. Could this use of free content be why I am getting listed at some big LL's but not at others.
Thanks for any help you can give me it is really appreciated. |
2006-10-30, 10:25 AM | #2 |
Former pr0n slinger.
|
The url from some of your freesites might help
Your sites can get rejected for dozens of reasons. Using overused sponsor content can be indeed one of them. |
2006-10-30, 10:37 AM | #3 |
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Here is one that got listed at Adult List, LOR, Hoes, Penis Bot but not at Richerds Realm, JaysXXX or Smut Gremlins http://www.everydaywomennaked.com/Ma...eurs/index.htm This one got listed at LOR and Hoes but not any of the other large lists. http://www.bestmaturenude.com/Aged-H...omen/index.htm. I submit to over 70 LL's and get listed at the majority. But obviously I would like all of the large ones to list me at least occasionally and I was wondering if the free content could be the problem. Thanks for any help
|
2006-10-30, 11:43 AM | #4 |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Hey there Jonno
I took a quick peek at both those sites and don't see any glaring problems. Actually, I'd list both as is...that content doesn't appear to be overused. About the only comment I'd make is those big un-clickable thumbs on top of the gallery pages are pretty useless. Don't know if that may tick off some reviewers, but it's a possibility. |
2006-10-30, 04:57 PM | #5 |
Trying is the first step towards failure
|
I dont see alot wrong with them either.
But as Mr Yum said, those big thumbs... maybe reviewers think they will become clickable at a future time. Also your exit goes to a site with an afilliate code on it, so it is an outbound link. All in all though, at a quick look, they look ok. Ben
__________________
SinSexual Porn |
2006-10-30, 05:54 PM | #6 |
Screw you, guys. I'm going home.
|
They look fine to me.. actually you have the first one listed at my LL - but its none of the large ones for sure
You have 4 outgoing links on second gallery of the 2nd site but I dont recall reviewing it anyway. |
|
|