|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
2006-07-26, 06:46 AM | #1 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
federal felony for Webmasters to use innocent words like "Barbie" or "Furby"
__________________
Circle Of Violence |
2006-07-26, 06:49 AM | #2 |
Vagabond
|
Does that mean you have to promote Lanny Barbie as "Lanny Bar*ie" from now?
|
2006-07-26, 07:38 AM | #3 | ||
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd like to believe that they really mean to go after those who intentionally use those types of words to lure in every possible surfer, but I fear that the U.S. govt won't stop there. That's it - I'm going to work at Wal-Mart.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
||
2006-07-26, 07:49 AM | #4 | |
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Boy am I glad to be living across the ocean! Maybe they should also ban the word crime, then we all would be protected from it for ever! |
|
2006-07-26, 08:39 AM | #5 | |
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
|
|
2006-07-26, 08:46 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mohawk, New York
Posts: 19,477
|
I never could understand why people use domains or keywords that will draw children in. At the very, very least, they don't have credit cards. Much more importanly, it's just wrong.
|
2006-07-26, 08:54 AM | #7 |
Nothing funnier than the ridiculous faces you people make mid-coitus
|
I just used the word "furby" last night in a blog post.. not because i wanted to draw non paying children but to reference plushies.. dammit..
|
2006-07-26, 09:07 AM | #8 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
I remember a few years ago the owner of Rotten.com brought some heat upon himself by purchasing (and pointing) a domain which was a mispelling of a very popular toy company's domain. Now, if anyone wants to talk about a site that could be harmful to children - that's the site. That place gives adults nightmares. That's the kind of shit the gov't SHOULD be going after. (the domain pointing, not the content of the site) Maybe he was attempting to lure in the parents, but damn, you've got to be smarter than that. It was a bad move in many ways.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
2006-07-26, 09:50 AM | #9 |
NYC Boy That Moved To The Island
|
I dont have a problem with this
the word intent is all over this so if your taking other steps like labeling your pages they will never be able to prove any bad intent
__________________
Accepting New partners |
2006-07-26, 09:55 AM | #10 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
I agree with Tommy 100%
Quote:
spaz |
|
2006-07-26, 10:20 AM | #11 |
Certified Nice Person
|
As long as you can successfully prove your intent to a jury of your non-porn selling peers, you can go ahead and say whatever you want on your pages. "Intent" is going to be used in the manner that "obscene" is being used right now. They, not we, are going to decide what your intent it is.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
2006-07-26, 10:21 AM | #12 |
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 35
|
Of course the intention is good. I mean protecting children is one of the most important things there is.
But how can this make sense? banning words? what happened to freedom of speech? And imo all sites / site owners that try to draw in children should be prosecuted, not just the ones who are using the word barbie or something. P.S. should we all be worried about out "toys" category? |
2006-07-26, 10:32 AM | #13 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
seriously! what porn company is actually trying to lure children onto their sites?? What would be the point?
Kid visits your site - they can't join they dont have a credit card kid steals parents credit card to join a site and the parents charge back the entire 'protecting children argument' is about as lame as they come. The simple fact of the matter is the only people trying to lure children are the ones who want to want to harm them in the first place. No adult company is interested in anyone under the age of eighteen because we cant use them as content and we cant get them to join our sites. 'Protecting minors' is the red herring the far right uses as its main weapon in its aresenal against the adult industry. spaz |
2006-07-26, 10:49 AM | #14 |
Searching for Jimmy Hoffa
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 771
|
I'm not really sure why a porn website would want to lure just anyone there...if they don't have a credit card, I'm not interested in them, but I'm sure some webmasters use anything and everything to draw attention to themselves.
As long as there's no frivilous use of this, then I don't really have a problem with it. |
2006-07-26, 06:34 PM | #15 | |
There's Xanax in my thurible!
|
Quote:
And in California we can already look up sex offenders by area. I put in my buddies address and sent him a screenshot of his house absolutely surrounded by them. It was comedy gold. |
|
2006-07-26, 07:01 PM | #16 |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
I quit using words such as toy when I noticed an adult toy store had the # 3 Google spot. However, there are still many words used to describe things that could easily be taken out of context such as sweet, girlfriend, babe, skirt, cute, furry ....
How do you even mention starlets (as mentioned above) with names like Barbie, Lords or Candy? I want to read the exact law first. If it's clear that intent has to be part of it then I'm all for it. I don't want kids poking around my sites but I'd hate to get busted for promoting a starlet that has chosen a bad name. I've never really liked the idea of the choosing names like Bambi and Candy any way. |
2006-07-26, 10:49 PM | #17 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
Quote:
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury...it is clear that Mr. Evil Webmaster used the words "Simpson" from the cartoon and "twins" from the Olsen Twins with the INTENT to lure undergae surfers to their porn sites!"
__________________
Circle Of Violence |
|
2006-07-28, 12:22 PM | #18 | |
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NY State
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Yeah, I agree with Tommy as well. BUT, we all know the Gov't is heading down the path to a "quiet" (as in it's not going to be told on by media news outright) Orwellian response to it's citizens. I definitly agree that ANY use of wording that is meant to lure children into an adult site for any reason should be grounds for jailing the shitballs responsable for up to 50 years or more. BUT, that does not mean it should give the Gov't ANY right to throw US all (and I mean adult webmasters who run legit businesses and sites) into the same category. For gods sakes, what ever happened to useing common sense and justice? I have my pages labeled and have also included a FAQ by ASACP, also a link to report any type of suspected sites period, of that kind of low-life activity...I encourage people to do it too. I have reported many sites I've come across at other webmaster resource sites for listing underage shit etc., and I'll continue to do so for as long as it takes. Just my 2cents
__________________
Submit to WorldWeb Porn |
|
2006-07-28, 03:49 PM | #19 | |
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. |
|
2006-07-28, 10:01 PM | #20 | |
Are you sure this is the Sci-Fi Convention? It's full of nerds!
|
Quote:
yeah....because christ knows that porn and sex kill more kids each year the violence and drug usage right? along with stepparents beating and killing their step kids(the cinderella effect). you're fighting the wrong war. let's compare stats shall we...you gather up all the kids killed each year by porn....and I'll do the same for stepparents and drug usage. you want 50 years? how about pelican bay if you're wrong?|shocking|
__________________
Become part of the future of pornography....promote the first stages of VIRTUAL REALITY|shocking| |
|
2006-07-28, 10:58 PM | #21 |
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy. |
2006-07-29, 12:52 AM | #22 |
I'm the only guy in the world who has to wake up to have a nightmare
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,895
|
Not sure what kids being killed by porn has to do with anything.
If my 10 year old daughter is searching for barbie on google (and no, I wouldn't let her anywhere near the internet unsupervised, but that's a whole other argument) and up pops 'Lanny Barbie Fucks A Certain Clueless Cunt In The ass With A Strapon' as the title of one of the results, with the captured text along the lines of 'porn superstar lannie barbie dons a lethal strapon and tears into the webmasters most revered assclown's asshole....' then I'd be shocked as fuck if she felt like clicking on it. No intent to mislead there at all. If the title was 'Barbie, Barbie Do*ls, Barbie T*ys' and the text was some spammy shit like gets pulled, with no indication of it going to a pornsite until you click the link and get redirected to porn, or porn on an innocent sounding domain, then yeah, 50 years is good for me. I do see your arguments that it's all too easy for Bush & Co to bend the rules to interpret things in their own way, which is more an argument against Bush & Co than an argument about the proposed law imho. |
2006-07-29, 05:14 AM | #23 |
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 306
|
Anti porn laws wrapped in child protection laws. Seems to be the new theme for the DOJ. The sad thing is that they could be working WITH the adult industry to catch child preditors and protect children. But thats not really their point is it. Just another case of rich politicians that care more about votes and lining their pockets than they do about the United States.
__________________
Submit Your TGP Galleries |
2006-07-29, 10:07 AM | #24 | ||
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
||
2006-07-29, 10:18 AM | #25 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
I definately agree that the gov't should form some type of relationship with the industry, just as they would with any other. But the politics of the game won't allow it. As long as crucifixes hang on peoples' walls, we'll be having stones hurled in our general direction.
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
|
|