meta keywords for SEO

[Licker4U]

When putting in meta keywords for say a "big cock" site, which of the following is better and why? Is there a better way than either?

<META name="keywords" CONTENT="big, cock, massive, large, huge, dicks">

META name="keywords" CONTENT="big cocks, massive dicks, huge cocks, large dicks">

Do SE's see single words or groups of words? Do commas affect things?

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

When putting in meta keywords for say a "big cock" site, which of the following is better and why? Is there a better way than either?

<META name="keywords" CONTENT="big, cock, massive, large, huge, dicks">

META name="keywords" CONTENT="big cocks, massive dicks, huge cocks, large dicks">

Do SE's see single words or groups of words? Do commas affect things?

I use <meta name="keywords" content="">

The reason is because that is what my CoffeeCup html editor gives me when I insert the code for metas. I don't like the way that other version looks you have there, but I'm not sure if anything is wrong with it or not.

Are you asking if the SE's can see phrases as well? I'm not sure about commas, but have heard rumors about them being stop characters? I'm not sure on that tho, I've used both variations on that.

[Licker4U]

I use both:

<META name="description" CONTENT="pictures of a girl fucking a big cock">
<META name="keywords" CONTENT="big cock, huge cock, massive dick">
<meta name="classification" content="Adult">
<!--xxx rated-->
<!--adults only-->

"Description" for a sentence and "keywords" for words. I just don't know if words in keywords means individual words or if combinations or words works

[Servhot]

This is a long story. SE Optimization is not something you can do within 3 minutes. Go and search a bit for it, read some articles and start testing it with a site which isn't that important and you can burn it at the se's. Just keep in mind, if you are going deeper into it, do not expect any good results within 6 months. Even you have optimized a page it could take month's before the results are getting reflect within the search engines

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Servhot

This is a long story. SE Optimization is not something you can do within 3 minutes. Go and search a bit for it, read some articles and start testing it with a site which isn't that important and you can burn it at the se's. Just keep in mind, if you are going deeper into it, do not expect any good results within 6 months. Even you have optimized a page it could take month's before the results are getting reflect within the search engines

Hi Servhot.

I agree with what you say here, but Google is pretty quick about showing results of your changes imho. I think most of the other se's are very slow however. Just my 2 cents.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by Servhot

This is a long story. SE Optimization is not something you can do within 3 minutes. Go and search a bit for it, read some articles...

Well ya caught me. I was hoping someone with more SEO knowledge than me had already done some legwork and wouldn't mind sharing. I'm not lazy and don't mind searching, but if I have already done the legwork for something that might help someone else, I'll share what I know to save them some time. I may not be able to help the specific person that helped me, but what goes around comes around |goodidea "What we put into the lives of others will most surely come back into our own" (or something to that effect)

LOL I wonder if they have one of those "Dummies" books. I can see it now, "SEO For Dummies".

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

LOL I wonder if they have one of those "Dummies" books. I can see it now, "SEO For Dummies".

Wonder no more

http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/Dumm...88,page-1.html

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by LowryBigwood

Wonder no more

http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/Dumm...88,page-1.html

[Bill]

I think the second version is way more likly to bring you surfers than the first, altho I would say you should choose somewhat rarer keyphrases than those.

There's still debate ongoing about the whole spaces and/or commas thing, but it's hard to prove it makes that much difference.

There are other debates you'll also hear about the meta keywords tag, but it's a fairly weak tag.

I like to use it in the way I think it was originally intended, as a place to put _additional_ keywords, mispellings, and alternative spellings.

[Linkster]

More important - and deserves it own thread probably - is whether after the comma between phrase there should be a space or not

Go read Googles webmaster guidelines - it will tell you everything you need to know - that it doesnt matter one way or the other is fine - the closer you can make it to compliant html the better it is


BTW - there will be people that tell you that keywords dont matter to Google - they dont use them anyway - You have my permission (not that you need it) to yell BS as loud as you can cause they have started using them again

[Linkster]

Originally Posted by Servhot

This is a long story. SE Optimization is not something you can do within 3 minutes. Go and search a bit for it, read some articles and start testing it with a site which isn't that important and you can burn it at the se's. Just keep in mind, if you are going deeper into it, do not expect any good results within 6 months. Even you have optimized a page it could take month's before the results are getting reflect within the search engines

This is really not a long story - this forum is here specifically for questions like these - because we are helpful people around here and some of more successful at the SE game (we are not SEOs- they suck) just love to give back to our community

And BTW - your timeline is way off - it takes about 3 days to get a good listing in Google nowadays

[Greenguy]

I've heard that both have their benefits, but their flaws are almost too hard to ignore, let alone recognize & put to good use in the environment of SE html page production