Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2006-09-12, 05:45 PM   #1
Tommy
NYC Boy That Moved To The Island
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,940
Send a message via ICQ to Tommy
‘Gone Wild’ guilty of not tracking age of girls

Filmmakers fined $2.1 million by federal court for lax record keeping

WASHINGTON - The company that produces the “Girls Gone Wild” tapes of young women baring their breasts and acting in other sexual situations pleaded guilty Tuesday to federal charges and agreed to pay fines totaling $2.1 million.

Mantra Films Inc., based in Santa Monica, Calif., made the plea in U.S. District Court in Florida on charges of failing to maintain proof of age and identification for its young performers in sexually explicit films. It also failed to label its DVDs and videotapes properly as required by federal law.

A second company owned by Mantra’s founder, MRA Holdings LLC, entered into a deferred agreement on charges of improper labeling. Under that agreement with prosecutors, the charges would be dismissed after three years if MRA Holdings cooperates with future government prosecutions, admits wrongdoing and pays fines.

The two companies and their founder, Joseph Francis, will pay $2.1 million in fines and restitution, the Justice Department said.

Separate state charges in Florida alleging that two 17-year-old girls were videotaped by a “Girls Gone Wild” cameraman in sexual situations remain pending against Mantra and Francis.

“Today’s agreements ensure that Girls Gone Wild will comply with an important law designed to prevent the sexual exploitation of minors and puts other producers on notice that they must be in compliance as well,” said Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher.

An attorney for Mantra, Aaron Dyer, said the company would clean up its record keeping.

The charges involved “serious record-keeping issues that occurred several years ago,” he said. “Mantra takes these issues very seriously and has done everything it can to make sure this never occurs again.”

According to court papers, Mantra Films admitted to violating record keeping and labeling laws while distributing the videos during all of 2002 and part of 2003.

Founded in 1997, Mantra released 83 different titles and sold 4.5 million videos and DVDs in 2002, according to Hoover’s Inc., a business data firm in Austin, Texas.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14803961/
__________________
Accepting New partners
Tommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-12, 05:57 PM   #2
Greenguy
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
 
Greenguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo)
Posts: 41,758
Send a message via ICQ to Greenguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
Filmmakers fined $2.1 million by federal court for lax record keeping...and sold 4.5 million videos and DVDs in 2002...
He's in trouble if he was selling them for $0.50 each
__________________

Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network
Greenguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-12, 06:05 PM   #3
CatsEye
Trying is the first step towards failure
 
CatsEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Washington (no, the NICE one.)
Posts: 128
Send a message via ICQ to CatsEye
Gotta admit I'm glad to see him get slammed for something, anything. He's an incomparable fuckwit.
CatsEye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-12, 06:29 PM   #4
SirMoby
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
 
SirMoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
I don't care if he's a fuckwit or not. If he was filming under age models or not caring if he was filming under age models then there's an issue.

I'm guessing he still has plenty of cash.
SirMoby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-12, 10:00 PM   #5
neticule
A boy without mischief is like a bowling ball without a liquid center
 
neticule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 437
Should have been more of a fine.

He is an asshat.
__________________
Mom, I'm done! Come wipe!
neticule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-13, 09:30 AM   #6
ronnie
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,274
Send a message via ICQ to ronnie
Doubt it will put a big dent in their cash flow.

ronnie
ronnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-13, 10:43 AM   #7
emmanuelle
0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011
 
emmanuelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,441
Send a message via ICQ to emmanuelle
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirMoby View Post
I don't care if he's a fuckwit or not. If he was filming under age models or not caring if he was filming under age models then there's an issue.
Let's not forget 'usually intoxicated underage models'
In which case a release (and consent) is questionable
emmanuelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-13, 11:07 AM   #8
dekaz
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 91
I'm not suprised. I never liked the camera crew because I had a bad experience with one of them. We were out in springbreak and one of the guys kept pushing my friend to 'go wild'. I seriouslly didn't believe it was a "We just asked them" attitude. Getting very close to my friends and bugging them for a shot...no wonder most girls give in.
__________________
I played connect the dots with your beauty marks
dekaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2006-09-13, 11:18 AM   #9
Simon IA Cash
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
 
Simon IA Cash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 93
Send a message via ICQ to Simon IA Cash
Pressure is pressure, whether it's for a used car, a time-share resort place, or a girl taking off her shirt. Unfortunately, when it involves intoxicated underaged girls, the results are extended damage or various kinds. I've seen girls get swepped up in peer pressure to take off their tops before. Granted, they were much older than 17, but still. I would venture a guess that younger girls, less habituated with drinking, and still in a high school dreamland of social rules and fitting in, are much more susceptible to direct pressure. In any case, good thing they got fined.
__________________

simon -at- iacash dot com
icq: 231-421-229
Simon IA Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc