Link O'Rama Rule Changes (yipee) - Page 6

docholly · 2006-08-18, 10:57 AM

Let me just go on record as saying..i'm am so totally blown away by the number of people freaking out over 4 more pictures.. and a little extra cheap ass bandwidth..

Change, like surfer's dicks, is hard.

Useless · 2006-08-18, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexvilly

personally, going to stop submitting to every link-list from my database who copy this rule. for free sites submitters, it's not about traffic you receive from this or that link-list after all > it's about link-backs to get your free site indexed in SearchEngines in the end of the day. some forget this or haven't realised.

Holy Shit! A statement like that makes me WANT to adopt GG's new rules. Goddamn - if it would keep IGNORANT INBRED COCKSUCKERS LIKE YOU from ever submitting to me, it may be very well worth it.

Who the fuck do you think feels threatened by that? Do you think there are link list owners sitting at home wetting their panties because a few free site submitters don't like a couple of rules. WAKE THE FUCK UP! Free site submitters have never like the rules.

Christ, I hate Comic Sans, but you don't see me threatening to boycott LOR's FREE FUCKING TRAFFIC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Little Jimmy Norton

RAMOOOOME! SHOVE SEXVILLY BACK INTO HIS MOTHER'S CUNT SO THAT I DON'T HAVE TO READ HIS FUCKING POSTS!

Simon · 2006-08-18, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by docholly

Change, like surfer's dicks, is hard.

As is said, from your lips to God's ear.

Wait...

Yeah, that was pornographic and blasphemous at the same time.

Damn.

Greenguy · 2006-08-18, 01:31 PM

I think I know why Sexvilly is so upset with Link Lists

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexvilly

....got my email xxxchances.com banned in the beginning of my Carrier for copying ads from other free sites. I learned the lesson, built more that 700+ freesites of my own, and appealed 3 times but no reply followed. can you take care of this GreenGuy?

Honestly, I'm waiting to hear back form the webmaster that you copied the ads from before I remove you.

emmanuelle · 2006-08-18, 01:44 PM

Something that has not been covered in this (exhaustive) thread:

Very few sponsors offer downloadable content due either to 2275 issues, or licence controls. Many of the ones that do, seem to offer tiny 640x40- either screen caps, or with the idea that they are making life easier for submitters.

Personally, I am hoping that these changes reflect positively on smaller programs (such as ours

) who seem to be more flexible with their affiliates, and often produce their own content and so have no licencing issues to worry about.

Sexvilly · 2006-08-18, 01:50 PM

no Greenie, not upset with link-lists at all... upset with your new rule as some might follow... and would like to hear explanation of +4 pictures rule which no one asked.

freesites with COPIED Ads been removed long ago, I already answered for this of my mistakes and couple others on this board.

Greenguy · 2006-08-18, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexvilly

...upset with your new rule as some might follow... and would like to hear explanation of +4 pictures rule which no one asked...

I've explained it 4 times already - if I make one thing bigger, then they all have to be bigger - site size, pics size, number of pics, length of movies (which was too long under the old rules but fits nicely now)

MrYum · 2006-08-18, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon

As is said, from your lips to God's ear.

Wait...

Yeah, that was pornographic and blasphemous at the same time.

Damn.

Yea...it was...

Well done!

So Greenie...did ya think these relatively innocuous changes would cause such a furor??? lol

Jim · 2006-08-18, 02:47 PM

Why the fuck does it matter what one person decides to do to his own private site? I think it has been quite a few years that Greenie has had to go out and beg for people to submit to link-o-rama. So, the answer for everyone pissing and moaning about rule changes is simple, submit someplace else. Even if it is a 20% increase of free porn that will be the downfall of this business

There are plenty of new linklists everyday that really want sites with only 20 pictures. Use them and worry about your own sites. I have never understood the thinking behind anyone believing they were due an explanation about someone else's site's rules.

We used to get a lot of that on GreenguyandJim as well. Until people realized that discussing business actually made you more money that wondering who would hit Lindsey Lohan.

bluemoney · 2006-08-18, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim

. . . . wondering who would hit Lindsey Lohan.

For the record, I would hit Lindsey Lohan over and over and twice on Sunday.
OOPS! Scoot over Simon I'm going to hell with you.

MrYum · 2006-08-18, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluemoney

For the record, I would hit Lindsey Lohan over and over and twice on Sunday.
OOPS! Scoot over Simon I'm going to hell with you.

Make that a threeso..... oh wait! Nevermind...that could be mis-interpreted

spookyx · 2006-08-19, 07:10 AM

Well, just my 2 cents. I like the larger pic/24 pic rule. 10 pics always seemed kinda bare to me

hmmm wonder if we should make our hosted freesites 24 pics? feedback everyone?

WarBot · 2006-08-19, 11:30 AM

I have to give my 2 cents on this topic again. After much consideration, yes, I would hit Lindsey Lohan but Id prefer to hit Morena Baccarin.

But seriously,

Jays requires 40 (ish)
PK requires 30
LOR requires 24

I hope now that theres a 1200 w+h rule that some ll's will up their 80kb and under file size rule a bit.

HarryM · 2006-08-20, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarBot

I would hit Lindsey Lohan but Id prefer to hit Morena Baccarin.

zobmaster · 2006-08-22, 06:04 PM

no changes for me, I alway use 30 pics per free site. Just have to check for the pic size......

Dagwolf · 2006-08-25, 04:20 AM

I thought there was ALWAYS a rule on Link-o-rama against pics on html pages.

albundy · 2006-08-28, 09:51 PM

dont seem very bad, but i do not like the 1200 rule, many sponsors do not have that big pictures, i dont see a point of this rule

virgohippy · 2006-08-28, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albundy

dont seem very bad, but i do not like the 1200 rule, many sponsors do not have that big pictures, i dont see a point of this rule

FYI, it's 1200 combined width and height. A 750x450 pic passes the rule.

Almost all sponsors I can think of which don't offer content at least 750 don't offer any content at all.

albundy · 2006-08-28, 10:06 PM

i know its combined, my best sponsors offer 640*480 or similar, other good 1177 combined and so on

virgohippy · 2006-08-28, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albundy

i know its combined, my best sponsors offer 640*480 or similar, other good 1177 combined and so on

Nice thing about the adult biz: you're forced to adapt quickly!

softhaus · 2006-08-28, 11:31 PM

Jim;294152]Why the fuck does it matter what one person decides to do to his own private site?

No shit! Here are the rules. Do you meet the rules? If not move on. It seems everyone is so programmed that's the way we always did it and when it changes everybody freaks out.

Business changes daily and if you do not adjust, guess what you're out of business. I've owned a computer company since 1989 and if I didn't change my business model as I went along I would have been out of business in 1989.

Do you think that when a business makes a change (rules or whatever) that it's a knee jerk reaction? Of course not. It's a conscious decision that will make the business grow and take it to the next level.

And this is a business so if the business owner makes changes that's in the best interest of HIS business accept that fact and either comply or find something else to do that's more suitable (nothing changes)

My humble opinion.

Cheers

Greenguy · 2006-08-29, 07:28 AM

I've been watching the numbers over the last 2 weeks & I can honestly say that I am listing more sites per day & declining less & less, which is exactly what I was hoping for

Jim · 2006-08-29, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie

I've been watching the numbers over the last 2 weeks & I can honestly say that I am listing more sites per day & declining less & less, which is exactly what I was hoping for

Good for you, my friend.

Fuck those cocksuckers that try to tell you what to do with your own site. I have a few pet peeves and that is one of my biggest.

albundy · 2006-08-29, 10:16 AM

cool, that you list more sites, but its strange that happened after rules became more strict...

Greenguy · 2006-08-29, 10:19 AM

I wouldn't say more strict - I've always had pretty strict rules. I'd say that some rules make life easier & some make them harder.

Oddly enough, submits are down a bit, but since I'm listing more sites, I'm happy.

2006-08-18, 10:57 AM	#126
docholly Nothing funnier than the ridiculous faces you people make mid-coitus Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sin-City USA Posts: 4,973	Let me just go on record as saying..i'm am so totally blown away by the number of people freaking out over 4 more pictures.. and a little extra cheap ass bandwidth.. Change, like surfer's dicks, is hard. __________________ Support Indie Porn Sites OMGoddess You know you need some Bling!!

2006-08-18, 01:50 PM	#131
Sexvilly They have the Internet on computers, now? Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: www.sexvilly.com Posts: 140	no Greenie, not upset with link-lists at all... upset with your new rule as some might follow... and would like to hear explanation of +4 pictures rule which no one asked. freesites with COPIED Ads been removed long ago, I already answered for this of my mistakes and couple others on this board. __________________ I sell Blog Posts With Your Link - $5 Per Lifetime Link Last edited by Sexvilly; 2006-08-18 at 01:53 PM..

2006-08-19, 11:30 AM	#138
WarBot If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 306	I have to give my 2 cents on this topic again. After much consideration, yes, I would hit Lindsey Lohan but Id prefer to hit Morena Baccarin. But seriously, Jays requires 40 (ish) PK requires 30 LOR requires 24 I hope now that theres a 1200 w+h rule that some ll's will up their 80kb and under file size rule a bit. __________________ Submit Your TGP Galleries

2006-08-22, 06:04 PM	#140
zobmaster If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 37	no changes for me, I alway use 30 pics per free site. Just have to check for the pic size...... __________________ - trade with me - Submit your Free Sites

2006-08-25, 04:20 AM	#141
Dagwolf They have the Internet on computers, now? Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: British Columbia Posts: 146	I thought there was ALWAYS a rule on Link-o-rama against pics on html pages. __________________ Hey, what did I do this time?

2006-08-18, 01:44 PM	#130
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	Something that has not been covered in this (exhaustive) thread: Very few sponsors offer downloadable content due either to 2275 issues, or licence controls. Many of the ones that do, seem to offer tiny 640x40- either screen caps, or with the idea that they are making life easier for submitters. Personally, I am hoping that these changes reflect positively on smaller programs (such as ours ) who seem to be more flexible with their affiliates, and often produce their own content and so have no licencing issues to worry about.

2006-08-18, 02:47 PM	#134
Jim Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York Posts: 19,477	Why the fuck does it matter what one person decides to do to his own private site? I think it has been quite a few years that Greenie has had to go out and beg for people to submit to link-o-rama. So, the answer for everyone pissing and moaning about rule changes is simple, submit someplace else. Even if it is a 20% increase of free porn that will be the downfall of this business There are plenty of new linklists everyday that really want sites with only 20 pictures. Use them and worry about your own sites. I have never understood the thinking behind anyone believing they were due an explanation about someone else's site's rules. We used to get a lot of that on GreenguyandJim as well. Until people realized that discussing business actually made you more money that wondering who would hit Lindsey Lohan.

2006-08-19, 07:10 AM	#137
spookyx Kodak Ghosts Run Amok Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Hobbs End Posts: 1,718	Well, just my 2 cents. I like the larger pic/24 pic rule. 10 pics always seemed kinda bare to me hmmm wonder if we should make our hosted freesites 24 pics? feedback everyone?

2006-08-28, 09:51 PM	#142
albundy Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 77	dont seem very bad, but i do not like the 1200 rule, many sponsors do not have that big pictures, i dont see a point of this rule

2006-08-28, 10:06 PM	#144
albundy Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 77	i know its combined, my best sponsors offer 640*480 or similar, other good 1177 combined and so on

2006-08-28, 11:31 PM	#146
softhaus Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: USA Posts: 18	Jim;294152]Why the fuck does it matter what one person decides to do to his own private site? No shit! Here are the rules. Do you meet the rules? If not move on. It seems everyone is so programmed that's the way we always did it and when it changes everybody freaks out. Business changes daily and if you do not adjust, guess what you're out of business. I've owned a computer company since 1989 and if I didn't change my business model as I went along I would have been out of business in 1989. Do you think that when a business makes a change (rules or whatever) that it's a knee jerk reaction? Of course not. It's a conscious decision that will make the business grow and take it to the next level. And this is a business so if the business owner makes changes that's in the best interest of HIS business accept that fact and either comply or find something else to do that's more suitable (nothing changes) My humble opinion. Cheers Last edited by softhaus; 2006-08-28 at 11:35 PM..

2006-08-29, 07:28 AM	#147
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,758	I've been watching the numbers over the last 2 weeks & I can honestly say that I am listing more sites per day & declining less & less, which is exactly what I was hoping for __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2006-08-29, 10:16 AM	#149
albundy Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 77	cool, that you list more sites, but its strange that happened after rules became more strict...

2006-08-29, 10:19 AM	#150
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,758	I wouldn't say more strict - I've always had pretty strict rules. I'd say that some rules make life easier & some make them harder. Oddly enough, submits are down a bit, but since I'm listing more sites, I'm happy. __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network