So it's official. NATS programs might not give wm a credit for backup processor sales

[daizzzy]

Congrats for all NATS affiliates


http://boyfriendbucks.com/external.php?page=terms&nats=

Signups as a result of second tier processors or discount offers after failure of initial payment attempt are not included in the commission program. Referrals using mobile phone devises are not included in the commission program, at this time.


it's a bunch of deecash programs now and fuck you cash program. and there's no way to spot it, just to run test joins. well done TMM

[Cleo]

Only idiots send traffic to Dee programs.

[Greenguy]

Why is this a NATS problem? NATS doesn't determine the programs TOS. And there's plenty of NATS programs to do perform those services.

It's the program that you should be bashing, not NATS

(look at me backing up NATS - lol)

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Why is this a NATS problem?

Because the option to NOT credit affiliate sales from non-primary billers in a cascade has to be something that is built in to the NATS software.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Toby

Because the option to NOT credit affiliate sales from non-primary billers in a cascade has to be something that is built in to the NATS software.

I wonder if the old NATS was not set up to handle some of that stuff? Or, if it's an option, it's still the program's fault for using it.

[terry]

This is just one of those life lessons. Move on.

[faxxaff]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Why is this a NATS problem? NATS doesn't determine the programs TOS. And there's plenty of NATS programs to do perform those services.

It's the program that you should be bashing, not NATS

(look at me backing up NATS - lol)

Didn't TMM once claim shaving was impossible with NATS?

[Greenguy]

This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Greenie

This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.

Well..... that just makes it "legalized" shaving. The ethics are still shady.

But, those programs using this "feature" don't exactly have stellar reputations for ethics anyway. So, anyone pushing them really doesn't have much room to complain.

[bluemoney]

Originally Posted by Cleo

Only idiots send traffic to Dee programs.

Congrats to Cleo, this years winner of "The gospel in 7 words or less award"

[faxxaff]

Originally Posted by Greenie

This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.

I am not familiar with this particular sponsor at all (but it's surrounded by super-shady people, isn't it), but I do know one thing: most programs change TOS silently behind the back of their partners. When you sign up you are promised heaven and to be credited for all sales. When sales numbers and ratios start to deteriorate, people are being confronted with 'changed TOS'.

[daizzzy]

Originally Posted by Toby

Well..... that just makes it "legalized" shaving. The ethics are still shady.

what he said

[Greenguy]

Anyone that thinks there's not shaving built into EVERY program is just kidding themselves.

[Voltar]

Originally Posted by Greenie

Anyone that thinks there's not shaving built into EVERY program is just kidding themselves.

Ditto on what GG said...been that way for years and years...if you look long enough you can see signs of it most everywhere..including mainstream...not just adult..