"Y---g (Blank)" Sponsors on Freesites?

Buncha · 2008-05-16, 08:34 PM

What's the general LL rule for promoting sponsors that use the word "y---g" in the site's name? I was under the impression that the term was banned outright, and I've always avoided it. But maybe I was wrong.

Is it alright to promote a legal 2257-compliant sponsor like "Y---g Models", "Y---g Busty", "Old-n-Y---g", etc? Or should any site that uses the word be avoided?

Thanks for the input.

Dave

Bill · 2008-05-16, 08:44 PM

Depends on the linklist.

There are a few that don't allow it.

Some don't allow it in site names.

Most do, but don't allow it in combination with certain other words.

y**ng girl and y**ng boy is nearly universally banned.

There's enough of a prohibition for those that I decided to censor them here.

SheepGuy · 2008-05-16, 08:53 PM

I prefer titles like "not quite ancient girls", or "not old bags".
Just makes me feel safer

Useless · 2008-05-19, 04:09 PM

Supreme Court Upholds Law Aimed at Child Pornography

Monday’s decision in United States v. Williams reinstated the conviction of Michael Williams of Florida, who was caught in a federal undercover operation in April 2004 and found guilty later of “pandering” child pornography, a charge defined in part as promoting or distributing real or “purported” material in a way that reflects the belief — or is intended to persuade another — that the material is indeed child pornography.

Greenguy · 2008-05-19, 04:11 PM

Even with Useless's post, I still say it depends on the word(s) before & after it.

Useless is older than me, but in terms of online work, he's a young webmaster

Useless · 2008-05-19, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie

Useless is older than me, but in terms of online work, he's a young webmaster

I'm one month older and I shave all of my gray hairs off!

I posted that article because I just read it on my Google homepage (or whatever they call it). I accept sites promoting Young Models and similar sites. I will scan a site for deliberately misleading text, but I'm far less attentive to the issue than in years past. As long as I don't think the submitter is deliberately attempting to portray the models as younger than legal, I'm cool with it, especially if they are wicked sexy - the model, not the submitter.

2008-05-16, 08:34 PM	#1
Buncha Ahhh ... sweet pity. Where would my love life be without it? Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 201	"Y---g (Blank)" Sponsors on Freesites? What's the general LL rule for promoting sponsors that use the word "y---g" in the site's name? I was under the impression that the term was banned outright, and I've always avoided it. But maybe I was wrong. Is it alright to promote a legal 2257-compliant sponsor like "Y---g Models", "Y---g Busty", "Old-n-Y---g", etc? Or should any site that uses the word be avoided? Thanks for the input. Dave Last edited by Buncha; 2008-05-16 at 08:48 PM..

2008-05-16, 08:53 PM	#3
SheepGuy It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 2,527	I prefer titles like "not quite ancient girls", or "not old bags". Just makes me feel safer __________________ If the Environment was a bank, they would have saved it by now.

2008-05-19, 04:11 PM	#5
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,754	Even with Useless's post, I still say it depends on the word(s) before & after it. Useless is older than me, but in terms of online work, he's a young webmaster __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2008-05-16, 08:44 PM	#2
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	Depends on the linklist. There are a few that don't allow it. Some don't allow it in site names. Most do, but don't allow it in combination with certain other words. yng girl and yng boy is nearly universally banned. There's enough of a prohibition for those that I decided to censor them here.

2008-05-19, 04:09 PM	#4
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	Supreme Court Upholds Law Aimed at Child Pornography Monday’s decision in United States v. Williams reinstated the conviction of Michael Williams of Florida, who was caught in a federal undercover operation in April 2004 and found guilty later of “pandering” child pornography, a charge defined in part as promoting or distributing real or “purported” material in a way that reflects the belief — or is intended to persuade another — that the material is indeed child pornography.