 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-14, 11:55 AM
|
#26 | |
|
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bluegrass State
Posts: 963
   |
Quote:
Jim
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-14, 01:06 PM
|
#27 |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 10
|
Ok, isn't 2257 a law as it is?
To change a law don't you need a new bill and doesn't it have to go thru the whole process of becoming a law again? They are trying to make a new law, so they have to start over, they can't just keep changing an established law to suite their whims. I didn't like that first article. It said 2257 is aimed at stopping child porn. That is so far from the f'ing truth. The only person cracking down on child porn is Oprah.  Leave us alone already, I have a nice cottage industry going here between me myself and my pussy. It has nothing to do with minors. And if they start taxing porn on the net they better tax everything else. If they do, I'm gonna give pics of my pussy away for free and put a link to 1-800-FLOWERS under them.  "The California law goes from soup to nuts," one industry executive said. "There's not one shadow of any evidence that the movie industry doesn't protect children." AND THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT THE PORN INDUSTRY DOESN'T PROTECT THEM EITHER-AHOLES!!! Thanks and have a nice day |blowkiss|
__________________
Peace, Candy</font></dt> <dt><a href="http://www.candyscuntlipcash.com/"><font face="Arial">CandysCuntLipCash.com |
|
|
|
|
2005-10-14, 07:16 PM
|
#28 |
|
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
That quote about "..soup to nuts.." was in a Hollywood Reporter article also.
That article mentioned a rather nasty aspect for the Hollywood folks. "The 2257 provision also has ramifications beyond the artistic as a federal tax provision designed to stem runaway production is unavailable to anyone required to register a 2257. Many state incentives designed to entice filmmakers to shoot on location also contain similar language. " So maybe they will have to change the tax laws to allow 2257, which means porn producers could become eligible for tax credits. |
|
|
|
|
2005-10-19, 01:15 PM
|
#29 |
|
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
|
Well at least this is bringing more attention to the whole case and getting more onside against the insane amount of regulations.
__________________
 40+ Hot Sites $35 to $40 Per Join or 65% |
|
|
|
|
2005-10-19, 02:49 PM
|
#30 | |
|
Heh Heh Heh! Lisa! Vampires are make believe, just like elves and gremlins and eskimos!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-19, 03:51 PM
|
#31 |
|
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Suprising how fast they can run backwards.
 Child-porn bill might get rewrite http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ory?id=1228246 |
|
|
|
|
2005-10-19, 06:00 PM
|
#32 | |
|
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-10-19, 09:26 PM
|
#33 |
|
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sex Delta
Posts: 5,084
|
Candy - unfortunately there are what are called implementing laws in this country - they can be changed by the attorney general in this case to implement a bill that was passed as law years ago as he sees fit. The congress usually just passes a law that is very general and then the departments (DOJ, NRC etc) do all of the implementation/interpretation code in the Federal Register to accomplish enforcing that law.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
