The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

[Star Man]

Originally Posted by crown333

Dear Greenie,

Our free site, http://www.badgirlsporno.org/ was rejected for alleged "Blind or Misleading Links". Since we never place any blind or misleading links in our sites, we are at a loss as to what your reviewers were referring to. Please tell us what the problem appears to be, and we will try to fix it ASAP. Thanks.

Crown333

Hey Crown333,I'm not a reviewer for greenie but I can tell you that "Blind or Misleading Links" was about 1 of the 1000 reasons that site won't get listed anywhere and I can't even begin to critique it without turning this post into an essay.

I suggest you and your 'free site building team' take the time to read a bit more.

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Star Man

Hey Crown333,I'm not a reviewer for greenie but I can tell you that "Blind or Misleading Links" was about 1 of the 1000 reasons that site won't get listed anywhere and I can't even begin to critique it without turning this post into an essay.

I suggest you and your 'free site building team' take the time to read a bit more.

Thanks for your comments. While the site has been accepted by most of the link lists we have submitted to so far, we realize this particular link list is more tasking than most. Getting our arms around all those "reasons" you referred to is our objective, and so your advise and comments are appreciated.

Crown333

[Pagan]

If you read the fine print on most webmaster pages, you can safely and easily bypass their rules for using those premade reciprocal link thingies and do your own as long as you follow certain guidelines. One of my tricks is when I see a link list I want to submit to, I read the rules, carefully. I check out a dozen or so sites that they have listed to see what inspirations I draw. Then I read the rules again. If a link list has a rule you can't abide by, don't compromise yourself. Just move on to the next. As to most all of the link lists accepting your site? I will be very very surprised because none of the better known lists you refer to accept blind links. Link-o-rama isn't more tasking - the rules are very clearly stated and fairly applied.

Useless and Mateusz and Starman are all very very valid in their constructive criticism. Perhaps by the time the guys get back you will have a site ready to submit to them. If you ask for help in the newbie forum, I bet you get it. If this doesn't make sense to you, or it raises your hackles, don't resist... don't fight.. just quit while you are ahead.

[Greenguy]

crown333 - Useless & the other posters hit the nail on the head. There's a lot of things on your site that break my listing rules.

If your site is listed at other places already, your best bet is to just remove my link & then re-read my listing rules. Like you said, it's hard to please every link list, but I think you'll find the ones that I share rules with are more legit & the ones that have 2 domains in their recips are a little sneaky.

As far as the tone of posts, it's text. You added the tone. And this is not some cute & cuddly board - we rarely sugar coat anything since there's no need to do so. You asked & got a very legit reply. Just because it's not the reply you were looking for does not mean it's not correct.

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Greenie

crown333 - Useless & the other posters hit the nail on the head. There's a lot of things on your site that break my listing rules.

If your site is listed at other places already, your best bet is to just remove my link & then re-read my listing rules. Like you said, it's hard to please every link list, but I think you'll find the ones that I share rules with are more legit & the ones that have 2 domains in their recips are a little sneaky.

As far as the tone of posts, it's text. You added the tone. And this is not some cute & cuddly board - we rarely sugar coat anything since there's no need to do so. You asked & got a very legit reply. Just because it's not the reply you were looking for does not mean it's not correct.

Dear Greenie:

Thank you for your reply, and confirmation that banners with 2-URLs conflict with your rules. As suggested, your link has been removed from our site, and we will not resubmit it, because if the conflict.

We never questioned the validity of any of the posts made about our site. Our responses to posts will indicate that we geniunely appreciated the comments, critique, and suggestions made by all who took the time to visit our site and make comment. All (except for removing the recip banners) were incorporated in our site. We'd like to thank them again.

Since you mentioned it, we will comment on the suggestion by some that we expect "motherly" treatment or a "cute & cuddly" experience at your forum. We made no such reference, suggestion, or request, as the posts will confirm. After 17 years in the rough and tumble adult business we can exchange "just text" with anyone, but we simply choose taking a different tack. We think it just makes for a more productive exchange. Whatever manner your forum works, however, is fine with us.

Our focus will continue to be merely submitting sites that comply with the link list's rules. We intend to imcorporate the comments and critique made here in any future submissions to you. Thanks.

Crown333

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by crown333

...Since you mentioned it, we will comment on the suggestion by some that we expect "motherly" treatment or a "cute & cuddly" experience at your forum. We made no such reference, suggestion, or request, as the posts will confirm....

Originally Posted by crown333

1. Thanks for the feedback on recips, etc., notwithstanding your tone....

It was that statement.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by crown333

Dear Greenie:

Thank you for your reply, and confirmation that banners with 2-URLs conflict with your rules. As suggested, your link has been removed from our site, and we will not resubmit it, because if the conflict.

We never questioned the validity of any of the posts made about our site. Our responses to posts will indicate that we geniunely appreciated the comments, critique, and suggestions made by all who took the time to visit our site and make comment. All (except for removing the recip banners) were incorporated in our site. We'd like to thank them again.

Since you mentioned it, we will comment on the suggestion by some that we expect "motherly" treatment or a "cute & cuddly" experience at your forum. We made no such reference, suggestion, or request, as the posts will confirm. After 17 years in the rough and tumble adult business we can exchange "just text" with anyone, but we simply choose taking a different tack. We think it just makes for a more productive exchange. Whatever manner your forum works, however, is fine with us.

Our focus will continue to be merely submitting sites that comply with the link list's rules. We intend to imcorporate the comments and critique made here in any future submissions to you. Thanks.

Crown333

Do you say 'we' rather than 'I' in order to make it sound as if you are something more than you are, which is a person who can't produce a decent-looking free site?

[crown333]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Do you say 'we' rather than 'I' in order to make it sound as if you are something more than you are, which is a person who can't produce a decent-looking free site?

Greenie,

There's your smoking gun, again. Useless has just confirmed our initial reaction regarding tone and agenda. We would rest our case about Useless' tone, but there appears to be more of this unproductive stuff to come. Should that occur, we may take off the gloves and respond to him with "just text" of our own.


Crown333

[Useless]

Originally Posted by crown333

Greenie,

There's your smoking gun, again. Useless has just confirmed our initial reaction regarding tone and agenda. We would rest our case about Useless' tone, but there appears to be more of this unproductive stuff to come. Should that occur, we may take off the gloves and respond to him with "just text" of our own.

Crown333

What are you, a fucking child? I was the first one to answer your pathetic newbie question and you've done nothing but bitch about me since. I mean, what the fuck? Let me guess -- this is your second board persona and I've pissed you off in the past.

If you had any goddamn sense, you'd be spending your time refining your free site instead of attempting to battle with. If you're here to pick a battle with me, fine. I'm up for piss and drama.

If you have a bone to pick with me, start a bitch thread in the Chit Chat forum. This thread is not the place for your childishness.

[Greenguy]

Crown333 - I really do hate to stereotype people, but based on your site & your posts, I truly do not think that I or anyone else on this board can help you with anything. YOU turned this thread into what it's become, not Useless. I ask that you take me off your submit list & have a nice life.

[NY Jester]

Site Name: Virgin Nubile Girl
Site URL: http://www.nubiles-girls.com/f/virgin-girl/
Category: TeenSoloGirls

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links

Sites showing as parked..that was quick.

[secretagentwilly]

Hey Greenie or MML, What category would you say this site fits into:

http://www.thepornindex.com/fs/up/bald/0941/1/1/

it's a bald chick....I'm looking for fetish or interracial...please advise.

Thank you in advance.

[Greenguy]

easymama - we'd list it in unusual or interracial, but I do have "goth" on my list of categories to add.

Also - side note - that guy played Obama in the Nailin Palin movie by Hustler

[secretagentwilly]

Thanks greenie...I'll touch up the recip and submit...

[shoosky]

I've try submitting free sites to link-o-rama but they rejected my sites as reason Blind or Misleading Links.Can you check it out for me where the blind links is?Thanks.
http://www.hotlesbianlist.com/freesi..._Poolside_Duo/

[MrMaryLou]

Originally Posted by shoosky

I've try submitting free sites to link-o-rama but they rejected my sites as reason Blind or Misleading Links.Can you check it out for me where the blind links is?Thanks.
http://www.hotlesbianlist.com/freesi..._Poolside_Duo/

You recipt links to http://debauchery.com/ and http://www.sortlinks.com/ blind they should have the name of link list in them as you have with your others.

[rblight]

GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

[Useless]

Originally Posted by rblight

GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

http://bl.usefulscripts.com/blocked/
It may or may not have been LOR that blacklisted you. Appeal and see what happens.

[rblight]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

http://bl.usefulscripts.com/blocked/
It may or may not have been LOR that blacklisted you. Appeal and see what happens.

Interesting. I have had zero problems with this domain submitting to LLs, except for the problem with GG. I had another domain on that blacklist and appealed but heard nothing back, so I suspect appealing is useless. The reason some of my domains may appear on this list is because last summer I was in the hospital for a few months and as a result my hosting got canceled. The host destroyed my content and I had no backup at the time. As a result, thousands of pages were hopelessly lost forever. I lost every one of my link trades.

NOTE, however, that my current problem with Link-O-Rama has nothing to do with this. He was accepting and listing my sites when I got back online in September of last year. I recently moved and noticed that all the listings are gone. This is the only list where that has happened.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by rblight

NOTE, however, that my current problem with Link-O-Rama has nothing to do with this. He was accepting and listing my sites when I got back online in September of last year. I recently moved and noticed that all the listings are gone. This is the only list where that has happened.

The reason stated is 404s, so it probably does stem from the time that you lost those pages. You really should take a moment to appeal.

[NY Jester]

Originally Posted by rblight

GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

You've also got 8 outbound links on this page http://www.38dds.com/stacked/nurses/nurses.html Id say thats going against most LL rules as excessive.

[rblight]

Originally Posted by NY Jester

You've also got 8 outbound links on this page http://www.38dds.com/stacked/nurses/nurses.html Id say thats going against most LL rules as excessive.

With all due respect, I rarely see the kind of maximums you are referring to, and I don't think I have ever seen a rule that says 15 is too many. In the Link-O-Rama rules, it says a minimum of five for non-partners, but there is no specific maximum limit stated.

[NY Jester]

Originally Posted by rblight

With all due respect, I rarely see the kind of maximums you are referring to, and I don't think I have ever seen a rule that says 15 is too many. In the Link-O-Rama rules, it says a minimum of five for non-partners, but there is no specific maximum limit stated.

But I do believe they want all the recip to other link lists on the index page. So no 15 is not too high a number just your placement seems a bit strange to me.

[abatis]

im just curious on this but if a domain was lost and the content was lost and the links where all lost....would it maybe be a better idea to get a new name and start over so you don't have to deal with this everywhere you try to get links?

-abatis

[rblight]

Originally Posted by abatis

im just curious on this but if a domain was lost and the content was lost and the links where all lost....would it maybe be a better idea to get a new name and start over so you don't have to deal with this everywhere you try to get links?

-abatis

Until now, I didn't even know that the domain was blacklisted. With the exception of GG and PB and a few others, I have had no problems getting listed anywhere. But unless I can get off the list, you are probably right.

I have heard it can be nearly impossible to win an appeal. If a LL operators wants to punish me for a bit of bad fortune, so be it. I am an honest webmaster and NEVER CHEAT. Their loss.