Free Site Looks?

fraggle · 2005-09-29, 09:07 AM

im just putting two peeps onto fulltime free site building and want to get some feedback from owners., however munder the questions sound

Free site design
Generally FS's are more html rich the fgx and a more ama feel to them (from my observations anyway).
This mean there is no room for swish designs and better kept with the ama feel or can either get listed and do well?

Useless · 2005-09-29, 09:27 AM

Could you state the question in English?

Fonz · 2005-09-29, 09:32 AM

I like both types of designs, but sometimes when the sites look too amateurish (like a 4-year-old built them) I tend to hit the decline button faster.
For what it's worth I think the amateurish designs still convert better.

neveremail · 2005-09-29, 11:04 AM

UW I think He's asking whats best - A Nice graphical design or Amateur shitty design as most freesites tend to be the latter.

I'm currently making a mixture of both and seeing what happens. Many people say that crappy designs that are more text and plain html orientated tend to convert better.

Just look at the major LLs to see that they are not very heavy on design and graphics. It was mentioned on the netpond show yesterday that ugly sites tend to sell better. It is also known that thumb TGPs (which also tend to have better design) tend to convert worse than text TGPs.

Graphics or no graphics I think you still need to keep your site neat, presentable and easy to navigate to get accepted at LLs.

I'm personally trying a mix at the moment. Compare:
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/sexy-bikini-girl/ with http://www.paradisebikinis.com/panty-girls/

A couple of reasons why more amateur designs may be better:

1. If the site the surfer on looks and feels good they feel like they are already getting good quality. If it looks shit and they go to a nice looking paysite then they feel the paysite really is worth paying for.
2. Less images mean the surfer may tend to focus a little more on the text which tends to spark his imagination a bit more than pictures.

Preacher · 2005-09-29, 11:57 AM

Which is funny, because the nicest looking free-sites on most linklists are their sponser's Free Hosted Sites.

-Preacher

2005-09-29, 09:07 AM	#1
fraggle WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: UK Posts: 44	Free Site Looks? im just putting two peeps onto fulltime free site building and want to get some feedback from owners., however munder the questions sound Free site design Generally FS's are more html rich the fgx and a more ama feel to them (from my observations anyway). This mean there is no room for swish designs and better kept with the ama feel or can either get listed and do well? __________________ ICQ:166-253-997 tim at ammediainc.com PerversionPays.com in testing, check it out

2005-09-29, 09:27 AM	#2
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	Could you state the question in English? __________________ Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.

2005-09-29, 09:32 AM	#3
Fonz Former pr0n slinger. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Antwerp, Belgium Posts: 7,929	I like both types of designs, but sometimes when the sites look too amateurish (like a 4-year-old built them) I tend to hit the decline button faster. For what it's worth I think the amateurish designs still convert better. __________________ See how I abuse little trees on my Shumi no Bonsai Blog

2005-09-29, 11:04 AM	#4
neveremail Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 504	UW I think He's asking whats best - A Nice graphical design or Amateur shitty design as most freesites tend to be the latter. I'm currently making a mixture of both and seeing what happens. Many people say that crappy designs that are more text and plain html orientated tend to convert better. Just look at the major LLs to see that they are not very heavy on design and graphics. It was mentioned on the netpond show yesterday that ugly sites tend to sell better. It is also known that thumb TGPs (which also tend to have better design) tend to convert worse than text TGPs. Graphics or no graphics I think you still need to keep your site neat, presentable and easy to navigate to get accepted at LLs. I'm personally trying a mix at the moment. Compare: http://www.paradisebikinis.com/sexy-bikini-girl/ with http://www.paradisebikinis.com/panty-girls/ A couple of reasons why more amateur designs may be better: 1. If the site the surfer on looks and feels good they feel like they are already getting good quality. If it looks shit and they go to a nice looking paysite then they feel the paysite really is worth paying for. 2. Less images mean the surfer may tend to focus a little more on the text which tends to spark his imagination a bit more than pictures. __________________ Please Re-Read The Rules For Sig Files

2005-09-29, 11:57 AM	#5
Preacher There's Xanax in my thurible! Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Wherever they screw on my head Posts: 2,441	Which is funny, because the nicest looking free-sites on most linklists are their sponser's Free Hosted Sites. -Preacher __________________ NSCash * This Depraved World