Is this a bad gallery?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Bobc01

Don't be such a pussy, they'd kill you just for being an American, whether you piss them off by insulting their religion or not.

I'm not one of those guys who'd tell them, "I'm American and proud. What you goin' do 'bout it?"

It would be more like, "I'm Canadian, eh."

[Bobc01]

Makes no difference, Canadian, British, you are a westerner and we're all infidels to them.

Show your fear of them and that's exactly what they're aiming for.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Bobc01

Show your fear of them and that's exactly what they're aiming for.

That's not true. They're after OUR oil. The problem is, all of OUR oil is under THEIR feet.

[Bobc01]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

That's not true. They're after OUR oil. The problem is, all of OUR oil is under THEIR feet.

lol It's not like they'll ever need it is it.


On a serious note, if you look at all the anti American, British propaganda by these fuckwits with pics of dead coalition sodiers with their faces blown off or blown up, on comparison showing a naked girl with a mohamed teddy is nothing compared.

I was flicking through a load of WP blogs the other day looking for inspiration for themes, it's surprising the amount of these extremeist blogs there are.

I was gonna post a few urls but i think it would be far to offensive to people on here.

[spacemanspiff]

As long as you don't post any pictures of cows, or people dancing, or people dancing with cows. I don't have a problem with it.

[Trixie]

Pretty fucking gorgeous and ambitious work, I think. The site owner probably doesn't realize it totally violates their payment processor's terms, though, and that they couldn't care less about whether or not it's art.

[Bassmaster]

Originally Posted by MountainGoat

In the course of my day to day, I happened to be redirected to this gallery, by a webmaster who I am building some pages for.

This is the address: http://www.nenablue.com/webmasters/c..._63/index.html

I have never seen anything like this, and to say that I was shocked, was a little of an understatement. I am not religious, but this could, to me, be overstepping the boundaries of what erotica is and isn't.

I think it would make for an interesting talking point, to say the least.

Have a look and please say what you guys think to it, and whether it is morally correct, or incorrect to depict a religious icon in this manner.

Wow, I know we are in the porn business, but to me that is un-acceptable! I believe in the free speech, etc etc, and I know the response here will be, "just don't look at it then" and that is correct, however, I don't see the need to even go there. I am ready for the haters to start the attack!!!

[KG Gary]

Originally Posted by Bassmaster

I am ready for the haters to start the attack!!!

For the most part it's religious folks who are the haters.
So much pointless hatred and most of it comes from polluting childrens' minds with religious poison so they grow into screwed-up adults.


I like the photos. They're sexy.

[[BV]]

CCBill will can that shit in a heartbeat.

[WoodStock]

Originally Posted by LusciousDelight

Damn, sombody get her a tampon!

haha

[Motorhead]

Actually, the gallery is nothing new. The concept was derived from the band, Cradle of Filth. Their artwork on posters and t-shirts consisting of half-naked nuns masturbating with crosses, crucified in expressions of sexual ecstasy and a famous t-shirt that stated Jesus was a Cunt. Their live stage shows, at one point, were even more explicit and sacrilegious. Hell, even Sam Kinison was on a cross, asking if anyone had a hammer!

[webpimp]

In a funny coincidence, I was just having a conversation with someone about this same issue (except my example was the virgin mary getting banged). My views:

Yes it is distasteful and offensive to many.
Yes we should have the freedom to look at it if it turns us on.
It's still porn, just because it has shock value doesn't make it art.

[Beaver Bob]

I think its great thanks for sharing, I have a blog thats perfect for it

[KCat]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

I think the chick should be allowed to worship the Lord in any way she sees fit without us passing judgement.

It's a beautifully shot gallery and obviously meant to be provocative. I'd recommend plastering it all over the place hoping to get a ton of traffic from the controversy, but the site would likely lose its processor. CCBill would see the blood, not the art.

[AdultSiteWorks]

Doesn't meet my personal taste

RB

[Simon]

It's still porn, just because it has shock value doesn't make it art.

True...but many also believe that art which does not disturb is merely decorative.

I'd much rather see more images that push the edges of things like this, instead of more and more boring images of young girls being made to vomit all over the cocks they're so obviously being paid to suck.*

Unfortunately most charge processors have little artistic sensibilities when it comes to imagery.


--
*Note: For clarity I should add that I think it's hot as hell when someone who really wants to
swallow your cock gags on it a bit when she's trying to get the last inch or two to go down.