"Porn" as a recip anchor

Jel · 2009-03-27, 02:14 AM

Ok I know this has been discussed and rejected in previous threads as being a blind link, but looking at Google today the top slots are taken by tube sites for that keyword. Inbound anchors obviously are a huge part of g's algo for determining serps, and if we as an industry want to prevent thousands of new bookmarkers a day to the tubes, it's time we started worrying lessabout a surfer being 'hit' by a blind link, and more about getting sites that don't give away full length movies back up in the serps for such a core search term.

How bad would it *really* be, if a recip table looked like this:

Porn Porn Porn
@ Hoes @ Jays @ Link-0-rama
cat link cat link cat link

Porn Porn Porn
@ Tommys @ Penisbot @ Wetplace
cat link cat link cat link

and so on, with the linked anchor to root, and the cat link to the page, for clicks there also? The bigger LLs like those above have domain age, existing backlinks, few with the sole word 'porn', so variance there as well, and the webmaster traffic to get plenty of different Class Cs etc from many submitters.

If we don't collectively get serps back to being populated by sites that don't give away the farm, pretty soon they'll be no bookmarkers left to see the 'blind' recips in the first place.

edit: Spaces didn't show, so recip table looks like this

Maj. Stress · 2009-03-27, 03:12 AM

I'm not sure that is the answer Jel. The links into PB are already linked that way. Penisbot's Porn.

However, I do agree we need to take back the serps, and soon.

Jel · 2009-03-27, 03:32 AM

From memory that's pretty recent though, after losing top spot, and PB is actually the only LL on page 1 for that keyword.

Greenguy · 2009-03-27, 08:07 AM

I would never be arrogant enough to ask for people to link to me with one keyword like that, unless the keyword is "greenguy"

You know what site deserves a link that says "porn"? porn.com or porn.net

And if you want to link to Kit's site with one word, I'd suggest it be "douchebag"

Jel · 2009-03-27, 08:19 AM

I think most submitters wouldn't mind at all linking with that keyword, especially if it means a bigger slice of page 1 serps for teaser pics/movies rather than full length movies.

A surfer is going to be disappointed to type porn into google, and arrive at LOR to find porn links? A webmaster is going to find it arrogant that you ask for that anchor, help you push up the serps, and in turn get more surfers to his/her freesite/blog? I'd say no to both.

2009-03-27, 02:14 AM	#1
Jel I'm the only guy in the world who has to wake up to have a nightmare Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: London, United Kingdom Posts: 1,895	"Porn" as a recip anchor Ok I know this has been discussed and rejected in previous threads as being a blind link, but looking at Google today the top slots are taken by tube sites for that keyword. Inbound anchors obviously are a huge part of g's algo for determining serps, and if we as an industry want to prevent thousands of new bookmarkers a day to the tubes, it's time we started worrying lessabout a surfer being 'hit' by a blind link, and more about getting sites that don't give away full length movies back up in the serps for such a core search term. How bad would it really be, if a recip table looked like this: Porn Porn Porn @ Hoes @ Jays @ Link-0-rama cat link cat link cat link Porn Porn Porn @ Tommys @ Penisbot @ Wetplace cat link cat link cat link and so on, with the linked anchor to root, and the cat link to the page, for clicks there also? The bigger LLs like those above have domain age, existing backlinks, few with the sole word 'porn', so variance there as well, and the webmaster traffic to get plenty of different Class Cs etc from many submitters. If we don't collectively get serps back to being populated by sites that don't give away the farm, pretty soon they'll be no bookmarkers left to see the 'blind' recips in the first place. edit: Spaces didn't show, so recip table looks like this Last edited by Jel; 2009-03-27 at 02:22 AM..

2009-03-27, 08:07 AM	#4
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,775	I would never be arrogant enough to ask for people to link to me with one keyword like that, unless the keyword is "greenguy" You know what site deserves a link that says "porn"? porn.com or porn.net And if you want to link to Kit's site with one word, I'd suggest it be "douchebag" __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2009-03-27, 03:12 AM	#2
Maj. Stress Progress rarely comes in buckets, it normally comes in teaspoons Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Dark Side Of Naboo Posts: 1,289	I'm not sure that is the answer Jel. The links into PB are already linked that way. Penisbot's Porn. However, I do agree we need to take back the serps, and soon.

2009-03-27, 03:32 AM	#3
Jel I'm the only guy in the world who has to wake up to have a nightmare Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: London, United Kingdom Posts: 1,895	From memory that's pretty recent though, after losing top spot, and PB is actually the only LL on page 1 for that keyword.

2009-03-27, 08:19 AM	#5
Jel I'm the only guy in the world who has to wake up to have a nightmare Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: London, United Kingdom Posts: 1,895	I think most submitters wouldn't mind at all linking with that keyword, especially if it means a bigger slice of page 1 serps for teaser pics/movies rather than full length movies. A surfer is going to be disappointed to type porn into google, and arrive at LOR to find porn links? A webmaster is going to find it arrogant that you ask for that anchor, help you push up the serps, and in turn get more surfers to his/her freesite/blog? I'd say no to both.