|
|
2007-09-16, 09:49 AM | #1 | |
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
|
Quote:
A few comments that may help you; I see the site is designed for 1024 wide. While that's not a problem with some lists (mine included), I suspect there are still some reviewers hanging on to the 800 wide rule. Definitely something for you to consider while setting up who you want to submit the site to. That spammy keywords meta, with irrelevant terms to boot, isn't going to help you. And may in fact cause declines with reviewers who check such things. Here's a thread I did a while back on metas... Free Site Meta Tags Tips You 2257 link almost vanishes on mouseover. Probably not an issue that would cause declines, but can't help matters either. As mentioned, most lists allow up to 3 outbound links per page, I'd think of a way to get one more ad on those galleries. Perhaps something about that gigantic image at the top of the pages, which by the way is pretty pixelated and not really doing you any good. If you really want to design something that's better than most of the sites I see, try changing up your metas on every page. Same story with the on page text, change it up on every page. Building unique pages will pay long term dividends Other than those issues, the site looks fine. But, it could use some tweaking to really be better than what we see every day |
|
2007-09-16, 03:02 PM | #2 | |||||||
A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one!
|
Thanks for such a descriptive reply, it was very helpful.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for the big pictures, that wasn't pixelation (Unless I've mistaken the reason you said it was). I overlayed the pictures with lines of gradient, because I've seen it done elsewhere and liked the result. I've taken it out of all three of the big pictures, so it shouldn't look pixelated anymore. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks again for your review, it was very enlightening |
|||||||
|
|