What are you going to do about this 2257 shit? - Page 5

1freepornfinder · 2004-08-06, 02:21 PM

I think we have to be very careful about masturbation... any touching could be considered masturbation....

Useless · 2004-08-06, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1freepornfinder
I think we have to be very careful about masturbation... any touching could be considered masturbation....

I agree...shake it more than 100 or so times and you are playing with it.

xxxjay · 2004-08-06, 06:36 PM

(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

Alphawolf · 2004-08-06, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

If you've got pink you should have the ink.

1freepornfinder · 2004-08-06, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

you're right .... it's not cut and dried at all....

security_man · 2004-08-06, 08:55 PM

my understanding is that E is not part of 2257 - its only A through D, or did i missread it?

lassiter · 2004-08-06, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
my understanding is that E is not part of 2257 - its only A through D, or did i missread it?

No, you have it right. (E) is not included in 2257 regulations.

rollergirl · 2004-08-22, 04:16 PM

I'm sure I missed this somewhere, but I can't find the info on if this is retro active (ie: being secondary producer needs actual docs) or if it's new content added after the date this goes into effect.

I have a few reputable providers I've purchased from who flat out won't give me the docs I requested because it's too much work to go dig them out of the back room.

If the sites prior to the change are grandfathered, how would you document that?

I also haven't seen posts by anyone who owns toplists like nastyfriends as to what they will be doing. It seems too broad as to if an is called from another site (fpa or banner, button) if you are responsible. I agree text links are probably safest, but I'd love to know what the expectation is.

I know this thread is old.. I need to get up to speed if anyone has anymore info or could point me to a resouce that has this info.

RawAlex · 2004-08-22, 11:15 PM

Rollergirl, that is one of the many things about these new "clarifications" that is not clear. It is really hard to figure out what the heck is going on... if anything.

Alex

xxxjay · 2004-08-23, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RawAlex
Linkster, so far with the exception of a very few, most of the people bringing up the subject are trying to sell tracking software or DRM type arrangements for content. There has been a ton of "the sky is falling" stuff.

Personally, I think the new "rule clarifications" are not that, but in fact new laws and amendments to laws, which, when taken to a court of law, will be thrown out because these new laws were not passed by the house, the senate, and signed by POTUS. While they can calify rules with these adminstrative orders, they cannot create new offences where none previously existed, nor can they create retroactive paperwork requirements for individuals and companies that were previously exempt.

A few will get nailed, but like Acacia, someone will take them to court and things will settle back down.

1 more reason for Americans to vote Bush and his bullies out of office.

Alex

I agree. Everyone should be dilligent, but these new regs are so burley that it is not likely they can be pushed through as is.

In a few months - you will have a chance to put this away for good by voting Bush out of office.

View Poll Results: The new 2257 regulations go in effect in less than a month. My question is: What are
I’m getting out of the business.	1	1.56%
I am feverishly trying to get my records in order.	4	6.25%
I am beefing up my 2257 statement, but realize trying to get a model ID for every graphic on my site is impossible.	6	9.38%
I am renouncing my citizenship to the US and moving offshore.	0	0%
I am moving my company, servers, and banking offshore.	1	1.56%
I am moving my company offshore.	0	0%
I am censoring all of my content.	2	3.13%
I am doing nothing, I am doing nothing.	15	23.44%
I live outside the US. This does not affect me.	20	31.25%
I am hoping Bush gets out of office and this all dies down.	15	23.44%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

2004-08-06, 02:21 PM	#101
1freepornfinder You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try' Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Virginia Posts: 162	I think we have to be very careful about masturbation... any touching could be considered masturbation.... __________________ www.1freepornfinder.com www.freeporn-sites.net www.freegaypornfinder.com

2004-08-06, 06:36 PM	#103
xxxjay You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: atlanta Posts: 1,787	(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; -- Could mean about anything but tits IMO. __________________ Circle Of Violence

2004-08-06, 08:55 PM	#106
security_man Are you sure this is the Sci-Fi Convention? It's full of nerds! Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Texas Posts: 260	my understanding is that E is not part of 2257 - its only A through D, or did i missread it? __________________ <a href="http://www.linkalotapuss.com/home.php" target="_blank"><font face="Trebuchet MS">Linkalotapuss.com</a> - Submit your sites</font>

2004-08-22, 04:16 PM	#108
rollergirl I'm going to the backseat of my car with the woman I love, and I won't be back for TEN MINUTES Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 82	retroactive?? I'm sure I missed this somewhere, but I can't find the info on if this is retro active (ie: being secondary producer needs actual docs) or if it's new content added after the date this goes into effect. I have a few reputable providers I've purchased from who flat out won't give me the docs I requested because it's too much work to go dig them out of the back room. If the sites prior to the change are grandfathered, how would you document that? I also haven't seen posts by anyone who owns toplists like nastyfriends as to what they will be doing. It seems too broad as to if an is called from another site (fpa or banner, button) if you are responsible. I agree text links are probably safest, but I'd love to know what the expectation is. I know this thread is old.. I need to get up to speed if anyone has anymore info or could point me to a resouce that has this info.

2004-08-22, 11:15 PM	#109
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Rollergirl, that is one of the many things about these new "clarifications" that is not clear. It is really hard to figure out what the heck is going on... if anything. Alex