|
2005-09-16, 04:24 PM | #26 |
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
|
Here is the other take direct from the FCS:
BILL WOULD EXPAND GOVERNMENT POWERS WASHINGTON, DC -- A bill (H.R. 3726) by Representative Mike Pence (R-Ind), which would greatly expand the reach of obscenity law and U.S.C. 18 §2257, the federal record-keeping law, has passed the House, sailing through committee hearings and a floor vote with virtually no debate shortly after it was introduced and attached as an amendment to the Child Safety Act of 2005 (H.R. 3132). In effect, H.R. 3726, the “Child Pornography Prevention Act of 2005,” was a done deal in the House almost before the adult industry or civil liberties groups knew it existed. The fast-track nature of the process, along with the key characters involved, has led some observers to speculate that the Justice Department, perhaps embarrassed by their lame defense of the 2257 law against adult industry attorneys in FSC’s challenge, have teamed up with legislators to up the ante and possibly to shore up what they see as loopholes in the law (See Mark Kernes’ report at AVN.com). H.R. 3726 covers the waterfront well beyond changes to 2257. It also amends other title 18 criminal code sections, including sections 1467, 3486, and 1465. The 2257 amendments insert new language which, according to an initial ACLU analysis, seems to require 2257 documentation for digital images of sexual conduct even though no actual person is involved. In addition, it strikes the word “actual” from the phrase “actual sexually explicit conduct” in U.S.C. 18 §2257, thereby appearing to expand the law to apply to simulated sex such as might appear in R-rated mainstream films. It broadens 2257 to apply to “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area,” which, of course, could be construed to apply to most nude models in adult entertainment materials, and perhaps even some clothed ones. It also strikes the language in 2257 which excludes “mere distribution” and other activities not involving work with the actual performers from requirements for 2257 documentation, substituting language which appears to rope in a much broader range of activity. Under H.R. 3726, for example, 2257 record-keeping would be required for managers of computer sites or services that contain a single visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct (including, under this bill, simulated sexually explicit conduct). Not satisfied with this exponential expansion of the 2257 law, the bill goes on to amend the following sections related to obscenity law: U.S.C. 18 §1467 is amended to expand the reach of federal assets forfeiture laws to include 2257 violations and obscenity convictions. U.S.C. 18 §3486 is expanded to include obscenity charges under administrative subpoena powers previously dedicated to child pornography cases, making it easier for the government to compel a person to appear or to obtain records in a legal proceeding without having to demonstrate probable cause before a judge. U.S.C. 18 §1465 is amended to prohibit the production of obscenity as well as the transportation, distribution and sale of it. Under this change it would be illegal to produce obscenity with the intent to transport, distribute or transmit in interstate or foreign commerce. According to the ACLU analysis, this would amount to prior restraint on speech. The only way to determine if material is obscene is to have a completed product for a judge or jury to evaluate under the Miller test for obscenity. Regarding any potential impact H.R. 3726 might have on Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales, the Free Speech Coalition’s current legal challenge to 2257, FSC Board Chair Jeffrey Douglas said, “This action by the House of Representatives does not have any direct impact on the pending FSC lawsuit. If this horrific bill were to become law in its current form, it would change some of our arguments, indeed strengthening several. For the purposes of the awaited ruling on our preliminary injunction request, it should have no effect whatsoever.” FSC attorneys and FSC Legislative Affairs Director Kat Sunlove are preparing a complete analysis of H.R. 3726, which will be posted on the FSC website (www.freespeechcoalition.com) as soon as it is ready. From an FSC press release, 9/15/05 And from an ACLU “Talking Points” paper -- URL not available And from Mark Kernes, AVN.com http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=240327 __________________________________________________________
__________________
The Woman with a Surprise |
2005-09-16, 04:25 PM | #27 | |
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
2005-09-16, 04:29 PM | #28 |
If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance
|
My last post on this topic.
There is a huge difference between proposing legislation and enacting legislation. |
2005-09-16, 04:42 PM | #29 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Next door to a kid with a moped.
Posts: 1,492
|
Wake me up when the judge rules on the injunction hearing.
__________________
BUY MY PORNSITES! |
2005-09-16, 05:26 PM | #30 | |
If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance
|
Quote:
|
|
2005-09-17, 02:42 AM | #31 |
Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer?
|
and we pay them too......
|
2005-09-17, 06:46 AM | #32 |
I'm going to the backseat of my car with the woman I love, and I won't be back for TEN MINUTES
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 85
|
I've got just one question for all you US webmasters:
How many got off your ass and voted last election? I did. May the rest of you catch ass herpes.
__________________
gender enigma relaunching July 17. 2009...ish |
2005-09-17, 10:44 AM | #33 |
NYC Boy That Moved To The Island
|
I voted for the first time in NOV
it is important that we all get out to vote a lot of you are thinking it wouldnt have made a difference maybe if the race was a little closer bush would smarten up the best thing is to tell your friends, neighbors and family to vote Democrat, keep up the bush bashing:-)
__________________
Accepting New partners |
2005-09-17, 12:54 PM | #34 | |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
In 9 months we've seen The Energy Bill, The Highway Bill, the responce to Katrina, the admitting that there were no ties to terrorism or WMD and now this attack on freedom of speech. We have 3.3 more years of this. We can vote and try educate those that are allowing these fascists to take over. |
|
2005-09-18, 01:56 AM | #35 | |
Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
|
Quote:
|
|
2005-09-18, 03:31 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 115
|
some one must take care of bush... hehehe... but must look like an accident.
I mean, take alcohol, two trannys and a picture camera. Get bush drunk and take pictures with the trannys. Dick on his mouth, all the hardcore stuff... but it must look like an accident! |
2005-09-18, 03:36 AM | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
hey, face it... bush is hitler's rencarnation. How can more than half america vote for that pice of shit????? |
|
2005-09-22, 06:49 PM | #38 |
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12
|
i have a question. i have a forum like this one. where a lot of my members post their own personal pictures. ive seen this on numerous other sites. am i responsible to get them all(4000+) to send me release forms and copies of ids or do i need a disclosure.
thanks |
2005-09-22, 06:59 PM | #39 | |
Trying is the first step towards failure
|
Quote:
|
|
2005-09-22, 08:16 PM | #40 | |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
Quote:
If you want to be 2257 compliant then you need unblocked photo IDs and a date stamp of when the photos were taken. Basically there is no way that your site could possibly comply with the proposed changes in 2257. |
|
2005-09-22, 08:29 PM | #41 |
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 12
|
so i am better off taking down the site. thanks
|
2005-09-22, 10:54 PM | #42 | |
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
|
Quote:
Linda
__________________
The Woman with a Surprise |
|
2005-09-23, 01:33 AM | #43 | |
No offence Apu, but when they were handing out religions you must have been out taking a whizz
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
|
|
2005-09-23, 04:48 PM | #44 |
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
|
My corporate attorney informed me to not sweat an actual custodian name as long as the company is legit and the address is not some made up post office box, or warehouse. The custodian, "Hairy Fishnuts" didn't want his name to be released.
__________________
The Woman with a Surprise |
2005-09-23, 07:42 PM | #45 | |
No offence Apu, but when they were handing out religions you must have been out taking a whizz
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|