2257 for all films with love scenes?

Verbal · 2005-10-12, 02:43 PM

Pretty fucked up... they now want every Hollywood movie with a simulated sex scene to be 2257 compliant.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051012/film_nm/porn_dc

tickler · 2005-10-12, 03:00 PM

Another blurb from British paper.
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/stor...590432,00.html

The "actual" sex exclusion was originally to keep Hollywood exempt.

Tommy · 2005-10-12, 03:13 PM

I was hoping hollywood would sit up and take notice

this will be a good thing for the adult industry

and when regular people see that the goverment jesus freaks are trying to censor even pg rated movies
it will only help our argument that the goverment has and is going to far

spazlabz · 2005-10-14, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

I was hoping hollywood would sit up and take notice

this will be a good thing for the adult industry

and when regular people see that the goverment jesus freaks are trying to censor even pg rated movies
it will only help our argument that the goverment has and is going to far

I couldnt agree with you more. I think this is what is needed.

Jim

Candy · 2005-10-14, 01:06 PM

Ok, isn't 2257 a law as it is?

To change a law don't you need a new bill and doesn't it have to go thru the whole process of becoming a law again?

They are trying to make a new law, so they have to start over, they can't just keep changing an established law to suite their whims.

I didn't like that first article. It said 2257 is aimed at stopping child porn. That is so far from the f'ing truth. The only person cracking down on child porn is Oprah.

Leave us alone already, I have a nice cottage industry going here between me myself and my pussy. It has nothing to do with minors. And if they start taxing porn on the net they better tax everything else. If they do, I'm gonna give pics of my pussy away for free and put a link to 1-800-FLOWERS under them.

"The California law goes from soup to nuts," one industry executive said. "There's not one shadow of any evidence that the movie industry doesn't protect children."

AND THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT THE PORN INDUSTRY DOESN'T PROTECT THEM EITHER-AHOLES!!!

Thanks and have a nice day |blowkiss|

SpeedyG · 2005-10-19, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

I was hoping hollywood would sit up and take notice

this will be a good thing for the adult industry

and when regular people see that the goverment jesus freaks are trying to censor even pg rated movies
it will only help our argument that the goverment has and is going to far

Exactly

Verbal · 2005-10-12, 03:42 PM

I wonder if they'll need to get 2257 docs for the scene in Austin Powers where Mini-Me dry humps the missle.

Gotta protect the kids! |goodidea

SirMoby · 2005-10-12, 03:52 PM

This has passed one branch of our government weeks ago and still no one is jumping up and down. The FSC still looks like the only ones fighting this.

Tommy · 2005-10-12, 04:00 PM

no forgin preformers

the titanic would be classified as a porno film
so would swordfish and thousands of toher movies

hollywood might be willing to cut the nudity from new films but they cant do anything about the ones allready out there

Thumbler · 2005-10-12, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

the titanic would be classified as a porno film

That would be just absolutely ridiculous.

lassiter · 2005-10-13, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thumbler

That would be just absolutely ridiculous.

Sure, but that never stopped 'em before.

SirMoby · 2005-10-12, 04:19 PM

Tommy, answer my email and congrats.

Tommy · 2005-10-12, 04:31 PM

I dont have any emails from you

koolkat · 2005-10-12, 06:16 PM

So... does this mean that every single video store is going to have to keep the 2257 compliancy documents, since they would then become distributors just like with the adult industry.

This is a perfect example of Big Brother in action! Why did the Pilgrims come to the new continent of America? To escape the religious prosecution of the government! Gee... look what we are headed back to!

Useless · 2005-10-12, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by koolkat

Why did the Pilgrims come to the new continent of America? To escape the religious prosecution of the government!

Yes, but they were being persecuted because they were puritanical nutjobs. The Europeans were glad to see them go.

I'm going to start keeping 2257 records for all of my sex scenes. I'll only need my ID and the receipt for a bottle of hand cream.

koolkat · 2005-10-12, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Yes, but they were being persecuted because they were puritanical nutjobs. The Europeans were glad to see them go.

I'm going to start keeping 2257 records for all of my sex scenes. I'll only need my ID and the receipt for a bottle of hand cream.

Yeah... but the other little details don't help my case! Work with me here UW!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

the way I read it

yes, every little mom and pop video store and online retailer is gonna have to have a copy of Halle Berrys drivers license for her nude scene in swordfish

that could be 20 or maybe 30 thousand people in the usa will have to have a copy of her drivers license on file

How many employees does Blockbuster employ at their store. How many people would have access to these records? |shocking|

plateman · 2005-10-12, 09:35 PM

there fuckin crazy and if it passes - it will be one hell of a uprising - we all hope

Tommy · 2005-10-12, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by koolkat

So... does this mean that every single video store is going to have to keep the 2257 compliancy documents, since they would then become distributors just like with the adult industry.

the way I read it

yes, every little mom and pop video store and online retailer is gonna have to have a copy of Halle Berrys drivers license for her nude scene in swordfish

that could be 20 or maybe 30 thousand people in the usa will have to have a copy of her drivers license on file

SirMoby · 2005-10-12, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tommy

I dont have any emails from you

Check now. Came from my personal account that uses my first name and not my handle

babymaker · 2005-10-12, 10:31 PM

this is great tho overall since hollywood will kick in their lawyers and fuck AG up his bitch ass

wonder what they will do with the remake in the 90's of ****** hehehe

that ought to raise some eyebrows

wow fuck i got censored lol...the board killed the L word i was reffering to the movie in the 90's if anyone is worried lol not promoting a site

Mefo · 2005-10-13, 04:22 AM

lol most of the films have fake sex scenes in them especially the comedies

Mefo · 2005-10-13, 04:23 AM

btw I'm glad it's illegal over here in Europe to give out ID's to 3rd parties

tickler · 2005-10-14, 07:16 PM

That quote about "..soup to nuts.." was in a Hollywood Reporter article also.

That article mentioned a rather nasty aspect for the Hollywood folks.
"The 2257 provision also has ramifications beyond the artistic as a federal tax provision designed to stem runaway production is unavailable to anyone required to register a 2257. Many state incentives designed to entice filmmakers to shoot on location also contain similar language. "

So maybe they will have to change the tax laws to allow 2257, which means porn producers could become eligible for tax credits.

magicmike · 2005-10-19, 01:15 PM

Well at least this is bringing more attention to the whole case and getting more onside against the insane amount of regulations.

tickler · 2005-10-19, 03:51 PM

Suprising how fast they can run backwards.

Child-porn bill might get rewrite
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ory?id=1228246

2005-10-12, 02:43 PM	#1
Verbal Verbal prefers 56K Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 563	2257 for all films with love scenes? Pretty fucked up... they now want every Hollywood movie with a simulated sex scene to be 2257 compliant. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051012/film_nm/porn_dc __________________ Verbal

2005-10-12, 03:00 PM	#2
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	Another blurb from British paper. http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/stor...590432,00.html The "actual" sex exclusion was originally to keep Hollywood exempt. __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash

2005-10-12, 03:13 PM	#3
Tommy NYC Boy That Moved To The Island Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,940	I was hoping hollywood would sit up and take notice this will be a good thing for the adult industry and when regular people see that the goverment jesus freaks are trying to censor even pg rated movies it will only help our argument that the goverment has and is going to far __________________ Accepting New partners

2005-10-14, 01:06 PM	#5
Candy Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know? Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 10	Ok, isn't 2257 a law as it is? To change a law don't you need a new bill and doesn't it have to go thru the whole process of becoming a law again? They are trying to make a new law, so they have to start over, they can't just keep changing an established law to suite their whims. I didn't like that first article. It said 2257 is aimed at stopping child porn. That is so far from the f'ing truth. The only person cracking down on child porn is Oprah. Leave us alone already, I have a nice cottage industry going here between me myself and my pussy. It has nothing to do with minors. And if they start taxing porn on the net they better tax everything else. If they do, I'm gonna give pics of my pussy away for free and put a link to 1-800-FLOWERS under them. "The California law goes from soup to nuts," one industry executive said. "There's not one shadow of any evidence that the movie industry doesn't protect children." AND THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT THE PORN INDUSTRY DOESN'T PROTECT THEM EITHER-AHOLES!!! Thanks and have a nice day \|blowkiss\| __________________ Peace, Candy</font></dt> <dt><a href="http://www.candyscuntlipcash.com/"><font face="Arial">CandysCuntLipCash.com

2005-10-12, 03:42 PM	#7
Verbal Verbal prefers 56K Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chicago, IL Posts: 563	I wonder if they'll need to get 2257 docs for the scene in Austin Powers where Mini-Me dry humps the missle. Gotta protect the kids! \|goodidea __________________ Verbal

2005-10-12, 03:52 PM	#8
SirMoby Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 2,706	This has passed one branch of our government weeks ago and still no one is jumping up and down. The FSC still looks like the only ones fighting this.

2005-10-12, 04:00 PM	#9
Tommy NYC Boy That Moved To The Island Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,940	no forgin preformers the titanic would be classified as a porno film so would swordfish and thousands of toher movies hollywood might be willing to cut the nudity from new films but they cant do anything about the ones allready out there __________________ Accepting New partners

2005-10-12, 04:19 PM	#12
SirMoby Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 2,706	Tommy, answer my email and congrats.

2005-10-12, 04:31 PM	#13
Tommy NYC Boy That Moved To The Island Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,940	I dont have any emails from you __________________ Accepting New partners

2005-10-12, 06:16 PM	#14
koolkat Remember to rebel against the authorities, kids! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: SC Posts: 401	So... does this mean that every single video store is going to have to keep the 2257 compliancy documents, since they would then become distributors just like with the adult industry. This is a perfect example of Big Brother in action! Why did the Pilgrims come to the new continent of America? To escape the religious prosecution of the government! Gee... look what we are headed back to! __________________ Harry Beaver's Lodge

2005-10-12, 09:35 PM	#17
plateman What can I do - I was born this way LOL Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ohio Posts: 3,086	there fuckin crazy and if it passes - it will be one hell of a uprising - we all hope __________________ Submit to: Porn O Plenty XXX Links Reality Here

2005-10-12, 10:31 PM	#20
babymaker Someone Turn Off The Damn Heat! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: The Sewer....err.philly i mean Posts: 1,366	this is great tho overall since hollywood will kick in their lawyers and fuck AG up his bitch ass wonder what they will do with the remake in the 90's of **** hehehe that ought to raise some eyebrows wow fuck i got censored lol...the board killed the L word i was reffering to the movie in the 90's if anyone is worried lol not promoting a site __________________ Get ElevatedX W/Hosting 99MO!**

2005-10-13, 04:22 AM	#21
Mefo Well you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 150	lol most of the films have fake sex scenes in them especially the comedies __________________ Private Cash 121747195

2005-10-13, 04:23 AM	#22
Mefo Well you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 150	btw I'm glad it's illegal over here in Europe to give out ID's to 3rd parties __________________ Private Cash 121747195

2005-10-14, 07:16 PM	#23
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	That quote about "..soup to nuts.." was in a Hollywood Reporter article also. That article mentioned a rather nasty aspect for the Hollywood folks. "The 2257 provision also has ramifications beyond the artistic as a federal tax provision designed to stem runaway production is unavailable to anyone required to register a 2257. Many state incentives designed to entice filmmakers to shoot on location also contain similar language. " So maybe they will have to change the tax laws to allow 2257, which means porn producers could become eligible for tax credits. __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash

2005-10-19, 01:15 PM	#24
magicmike Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 20	Well at least this is bringing more attention to the whole case and getting more onside against the insane amount of regulations. __________________ 40+ Hot Sites $35 to $40 Per Join or 65%

2005-10-19, 03:51 PM	#25
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	Suprising how fast they can run backwards. Child-porn bill might get rewrite http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ory?id=1228246 __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash