Review request - our first FS

[pc]

When I click on "women spanking men" banner I've got weird message that this is Reported Attack Site!
Quote"This web site at www.women-spanking-men.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences."

You promoting sponsor with exploits or something like it.There is a google report.
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.c...nking-men.com/

By the way nice design

[HappySpanker]

Originally Posted by pclit

When I click on "women spanking men" banner I've got weird message that this is Reported Attack Site!
Quote"This web site at www.women-spanking-men.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences."

You promoting sponsor with exploits or something like it.There is a google report.
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.c...nking-men.com/

By the way nice design

Sounds like a Firefox blocking. They recently implemented some logic-flawed blacklistings and even some vanilla ecommerce sites I manage have been blocked for zero reason.

FWIW, the sponsor is quite legit and well established. They (realspankingsnetwork.com) operate a series of popular spanking sites with unique quality content. No negative issue I have heard relating to them has challenged their honesty or technical competance, so I have to assume this might be another Firefox/Opera fuck up. But I sure appreciate the link and will contact them for an answer.

I looked at their source and the -only- thing there which is not generic HTML is a silly Urchin tracking java snipplet; used on hundreds of thousands of pages on the net. It prolly writes a cookie which FireFox extrapolates to being a threat.

Just wait till the new IE 8 is released. It will have the same new "feature" of using static blacklists to give the surfer all manner of unjustified warm fuzzies.

[cd34]

Originally Posted by HappySpanker

Sounds like a Firefox blocking. They recently implemented some logic-flawed blacklistings and even some vanilla ecommerce sites I manage have been blocked for zero reason.

While I agree that google's safebrowsing is somewhat aggressive in what they have pinned as a dangerous site, the suspect IP is relatively well known for a number of iframe/xss exploits and codec installers. One of the top links in women-spanking-men's autorank pro toplist goes to a codec installer linked back to 85.255.118.0, the Russian Business Network.

So, as ominous as the warning seems to be, you are one click away from the RBN's codec installer when surfing http://www.women-spanking-men.com/. That is enough for google and the related companies that license that data to redflag the site.

Safebrowsing also claims to email warnings to several email addresses -- I have not seen evidence that they have done that in many of the cases I've tracked. One client's wordpress site had hidden text injected which linked to another RBN site. Once it was cleaned off his site, it took about 24 hours for google to remove it (and about 3 hours for firefox to clear it).

[pc]

Originally Posted by cd34

.... One client's wordpress site had hidden text injected which linked to another RBN site. Once it was cleaned off his site, it took about 24 hours for google to remove it (and about 3 hours for firefox to clear it).

I think that's fast enough for SE and app to update site status