lax rules or is it just me?

ponygirl · 2007-10-23, 12:05 PM

I've been noticing recently some submitters getting a little more, shall we say, adventurous

I see a few things I would have normally rejected (or gotten rejected) for passing through. Borderline blind links and banners, mostly - although I'll be the first to say I know there's no trying to screw the surfer or anything like that. Most of the time, these sites are listed where they're submitted, big guys included, and I'm thinking maybe I'm being too uptight??

I thought about this when I recently changed my rules. I don't want it to be a free-for-all, and I certainly don't want to be telling anyone it's ok to put blind links on your sites, but maybe it'll encourage some change in the freesite model, which could be a good thing. Or do we need to get tougher again & rein it in?

any LL owners care to comment?

2007-10-23, 12:05 PM	#1
ponygirl on vacation Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,095	lax rules or is it just me? I've been noticing recently some submitters getting a little more, shall we say, adventurous I see a few things I would have normally rejected (or gotten rejected) for passing through. Borderline blind links and banners, mostly - although I'll be the first to say I know there's no trying to screw the surfer or anything like that. Most of the time, these sites are listed where they're submitted, big guys included, and I'm thinking maybe I'm being too uptight?? I thought about this when I recently changed my rules. I don't want it to be a free-for-all, and I certainly don't want to be telling anyone it's ok to put blind links on your sites, but maybe it'll encourage some change in the freesite model, which could be a good thing. Or do we need to get tougher again & rein it in? any LL owners care to comment? __________________ Submit Your Porn I do CSS coding Hosting - JMB Scripts - Tube Site Resources