Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Search Forums
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Showing results 1 to 25 of 121
Search took 0.01 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: ardentgent
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-12-30, 02:20 PM
Replies: 15
Views: 1,971
Posted By ardentgent
Ok. Secondary producers are off the hook at least...

Ok. Secondary producers are off the hook at least for now. So please refresh my memory, what kind of 2257 statement is required of secondary producers on the galleries we make and what records to we...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-12-13, 08:08 PM
Replies: 3
Views: 1,131
Posted By ardentgent
Bangbros- What's Up

I have been unable to login to the Bangbros affiliate area for three days. I sent an email to support@bangbros.com and it bounced. Anyone having similar problems?

Thanks.

Mark
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-11-19, 03:18 PM
Replies: 288
Views: 29,958
Posted By ardentgent
Well said.

Well said.
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-07-17, 09:14 AM
Replies: 19
Views: 2,491
Posted By ardentgent
I believe the rule requires an active link. This...

I believe the rule requires an active link. This is becoming a problem. Some sites are getting rejected because there are too many links. I have found scripts rejecting some of my gallery...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-27, 04:34 PM
Replies: 3
Views: 1,215
Posted By ardentgent
2257 Record Keeping Help

I can't make heads or tails out of the record keeping requirements. Perhaps someone can give me a hand. I understand what I need to have regarding the model, and producer. But, assume I make a...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-23, 10:28 PM
Replies: 33
Views: 3,617
Posted By ardentgent
Linkster, I commend you for your post and the...

Linkster, I commend you for your post and the courage to make it in the face of a lot of anger directed at the FSC.

Like you said , they are a trade organization and their first loyaltyl has to be...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-20, 09:38 PM
Replies: 8
Views: 1,367
Posted By ardentgent
I guess they could end up in court if my gallery...

I guess they could end up in court if my gallery with explicit content leads the feds to them. But, If I am using content in violation of 2257 that is not directly their problem.
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-20, 09:33 PM
Replies: 33
Views: 2,417
Posted By ardentgent
I still don't know what javes.com is supposed to...

I still don't know what javes.com is supposed to be. Tell me. Tell me. Tell me.
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-20, 08:54 AM
Replies: 8
Views: 1,367
Posted By ardentgent
That's what I thought. Don't you think it's kinda...

That's what I thought. Don't you think it's kinda silly? If they are in compliance why should they really care?
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-19, 09:22 PM
Replies: 8
Views: 1,367
Posted By ardentgent
Another 2257 Question

In light of the 2257 regs, a number of sponsors seem to be concerned about the content being used by their affiliates to promote their sites. I can understand if the content is sponsor provided, but...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-18, 11:35 AM
Replies: 33
Views: 2,417
Posted By ardentgent
[QUOTE=Jim]To stop the madness, I have contacted...

[QUOTE=Jim]To stop the madness, I have contacted an Albany NY Bill of Rights Law Firm to give us their opinion on 2257. I have spoken to them on the phone, thus, http://www.javes.com

Jim- what...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-14, 09:06 PM
Replies: 30
Views: 2,573
Posted By ardentgent
I have seen that ars post but the regulations...

I have seen that ars post but the regulations exempt letter E of 2256 which defines sexually explicit conduct. E says lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person. So I don't...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-09, 02:14 PM
Replies: 8
Views: 1,258
Posted By ardentgent
I have just read 2257 policies from two sponsors...

I have just read 2257 policies from two sponsors who said that they considered pictures of the pubic area to be sexually explicit and warned us not to use them. Seems contrary to 2257 which seems...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-03, 09:14 PM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
If I use softcore content it will be sponsor...

If I use softcore content it will be sponsor content in which they have indicated that the models are over 18 or licensed content indicating the same. Furthermore, since 2257 would not apply I would...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-03, 08:56 PM
Replies: 147
Views: 17,128
Posted By ardentgent
E is exempt, not in the regs but in the statute...

E is exempt, not in the regs but in the statute itself. Title 18 Part I Chapter 110 Sub 2257, (h)(1)
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-03, 08:45 AM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
So if I understand you correctly, one can make a...

So if I understand you correctly, one can make a gallery consisting of simulated sexual activity and therefore be exempt from the record keeping requirements of 2257 including having model ID's...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 08:05 PM
Replies: 147
Views: 17,128
Posted By ardentgent
The statute applies to producers of sexually...

The statute applies to producers of sexually explicit matter.

In our discussion of this issue think there is unnecessary confusion because some of us are talking a from the perspective of a...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 07:55 PM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
I don't agree. 2257 uses 2256 to define sexually...

I don't agree. 2257 uses 2256 to define sexually explicit as :

As used in this section—
(1) the term “actual sexually explicit conduct” means actual but not simulated conduct as defined in...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 12:25 PM
Replies: 147
Views: 17,128
Posted By ardentgent
Paul, is it your opinion that pictures not...

Paul, is it your opinion that pictures not fitting the definition of sexually explicit as defined in 2257 are not covered by 2257? So if I make a gallery that does not meet the definition of...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 10:57 AM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
My question goes to pictures that are not of...

My question goes to pictures that are not of simulated sexual conduct but just nudity.
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 10:49 AM
Replies: 147
Views: 17,128
Posted By ardentgent
I believe that 2257 states that only A-D apply. E...

I believe that 2257 states that only A-D apply. E is exempt.
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-02, 09:51 AM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
Nudity ans 2257

Putting aside the issue of photosets that may contain harcore images even if one is using softcore images only from that photoset, does one need a compliance statement or exemption statement if the...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-06-01, 05:37 PM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
I would seem to agree with Alex here. However,...

I would seem to agree with Alex here. However, the exemption statement in 75.7 states in part that one may be exempt if "the matter containes only visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit...
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-05-30, 12:59 PM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
Disclaimers

Two quick questions for anyone who knows:

Was any disclaimer required prior to June 25, 2004?

If a gallery is completely softcore, no- nudity at all, is any disclaimer required?
Forum: General Business Knowledge 2005-05-29, 11:01 AM
Replies: 482
Views: 74,700
Posted By ardentgent
Sexually Explicit Conduct

The below url is a link to a power point presentation on the FSC webpage. In it it states that lascivious depiction of the pubic area is excluded from the definition of actual sexually explicit...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 121

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc