LOR rule 13
 

13 - Don't mix softcore and hardcore content

Please confirm is it the example of mixing softcore and hardcore content?

first
http://www.thekaktus.com/2008/daught...long-dick-xxx/

second
http://www.thekaktus.com/2008/daught...ack-cocks-xxx/

thanks :)

First - yes, I doubt it would get listed at LOR

Second - I think this one would get through, however I'm not reviewer there so you better wait for Greenie's or MML's answer

Agree, and I am a reviewer on my own LL only.

Your titles don't make sense.

Now all of you high school drop-outs, who either don't care about the language or somehow sympathize with him because you too are partially illiterate, can jump on my back and tell me what a horrible grammar nazi I am while I sit here sipping my caramel latte and read the New York Times*. (And yes, I realize that he's Polish. It was meant to be helpful guidance, but some of you people are such hateful fucking douchebags that you feel the need to make me look like a bad guy no matter what I say or how I say it.) Have a nice day.

*I don't, in actuality, read the New York Times.

I agree with all the replies.

Just as a random member that appreciates your helpful posts,I think your always right on the money UW!Yeah,your 'raw dog' attitude upsets people that get scared and offended by everything and need to be pampered 24/7 but to most you just tell it like it is dude.|thumb

I agree with all the replies too :)

I glimpsed at the content but when it comes to site names you're absolutely right

As far as content alone is concerned,I like what you did on the second site in the first gallery.You threw in a few soft teasers to start things off and then jumped right into the action!The trick is not to get carried away with the soft teaser stuff like you did on the first site.

A good rule of thumb I got from |greenguy|GG - make sure that at least half of the content on every page you build matches your sites title and whatever niche your building for.For example,If I build a cumshot site with 12 pics on a page,I make sure that at least 6 of them are cumshot photos.I find that doing this keeps me from slipping into the soft/hard mix zone and also just makes for a better site with solid content.

thanks for your help guys and Star Man. :-)

title of the second fs do not make sense too?

I can see there black cocks and teen (maybe she is not a teen and here it is the answer)

:)

I was reading the small letters and somehow thought this was a quote from the freesites. Seemed like weird sales text, but very well written.

Teen Black Cock would be the cock of a black male age 13-19

Your titles/text dont have to make fucking sense.
The point is to get SE traffic to the site, wich will be split between the recip shitters and the free site equaly.
You still don't see the 'titles dont make sense' stuff?... geez..

Do Not Forget...
You are a fuckin seller!!!

I disagree picXX. |catfight|

If you cruise down any page of LOR you'll see that every single site title makes sense and can be used in a sentence coherently.Some might not be something you would casually say in a sentence but their still mostly all coherent.Fitting keywords into a title could be tricky at times but thats no excuse for poor English.I review so many otherwise good sites that end up getting rejected because of titles that are so dumb sounding it simply can't be avoided.It's not like were using some advanced English here.Is putting 3 obscene words together coherently asking too much out of people that know HTML,PHP etc.? Come on.

Right.Thats why a good presentation is key!Most of us couldn't sell a drowning man a life raft anyhow so the least we can do is grasp the basics of the English language.|golf

I strongly disagree with you, but let's pretend that your correct & look at the free site titles in this example:

Blonde Long Dick XXX
Teen Black Cocks XXX

Based on those keywords, you would get SE results for people looking for blondes with long dicks and black teens showing off their cocks.

Seeing as these are black male/white female interracial sites, the titles make ZERO sense & would return useless traffic.

Are you attacking me or merely disagreeing with me? |huh

Either way, yes, your titles DO HAVE TO MAKE FUCKING SENSE. If you cannot find a way to optimize a short series of words and still use them in a sensible, grammatically correct manner, you should probably get a job cleaning gutters rather than online publishing/marketing.

You need to keep in mind, I am very likely a LOT smarter than you and have a much better grasp on this business, as well as many other things.

I never disagree with UW and I keep my door locked just in case he is thinking that I might be thinking about disagreeing with him. :)

On that "it doesn't need to make sense" point. If people are not searching for the seemingly random arrangement of dirty words then it is unlikely that google is sending users to an index containing those key phrases. It makes more sense arranging them in a coherent way, a way in which a coherent person might type them in at the search box. Unless incoherent people use their credit cards more and I'm totally targeting the wrong demographic :)

A lot of sites allow 4 word titles, so you could say Blonde Sucking Black Dick or even more creative Cheerleaders Gulping Black Cock. Trying to do a snappy title in 3 words is tough even when it is your native language let alone a learned one. There are also quite a number of LLs that allow you to have 5 word titles. Don't limit yourself to 3 tiny words.