5 pics solo..the rest hardcore
 

I am SICK of free sites doing this! Either make the site about a babe/slut/amateur/teen/whatever OR make it a blowjob/hardcore/anal/some other sex act! Combine this with it being sponsor content I've seen a few too many times and I'm ready to have a fit! |angry|

Had to vent... and if you are just starting to build free sites, please don't do this. I'm not the only one who deletes/bans for this.

That's a better ratio than 18 solo, 1 with cock near her ass, and 1 with it her ass penetrated and describing it as 'chick gets the assfucking of her life'.

Yep, just declined one last night...

Title was "Interracial Hardcore"...

13 pics of a white girl with a dildo...

7 poorly lighted pics of the white girl with a black guy. Think some of them may have had penetration, but hard to tell because they were so dark |angry|

I know it's not PC to disagree with link list owners, and I can't see the gallerys to judge for myself, but...

A couple of pics showing the couple before the sex scene isn't out of place, in my opinion. I spend a lot of money on content, most content goes from clothed to hardcore, and may include some solo shots. If it's done right the progression looks fine.

Some of the content uses described here sound highly lame to me too, I'm just saying some progression is entirely reasonable, and 5 'solo' pics followed by 15 hardcore isn't necessarily bad in itself.

Completely agree Bill |thumb

What you describe is exactly how I usually lay out my hardcore sites. Kinda like a little forplay to warm things up :D

I might even go a bit further than what you describe in some cases...depending on how the content set flows. But, for a hardcore site...I like to at least see the hardcore starting before the end of the first gallery.

Cumshots are another story...no way the poor bastard can cum for 20 or 30 pics! LOL!

Most linklist owners think they are the Traffic God's Gift to Webmasters. Their heads are so big they can't fit through the door. :)

Well, to elaborate a bit, Greenguy is the defacto gold standard of linklists, and GG has already said that he wants to see a natural progression in gallery pics.

So, as far as I'm concerned, natural progression is the rule.

Tart didn't specify wether or not there was a possibility of natural progression in the gallerys she was referring to. So, AKAIK, therre might have been a natural progression in going from 5 solo shots of a girl, for example, to 15 shots of sex involving the same girl.

15 shots of sex followed by 5 solos is definitely not a natural progression.

But if it's 5 shots of a girl naked on a bed, followed by 15 of the girl getting fucked on the same bed, well, we could argue, but I think that's a natural progression.

One more thing- I have little sympathy for people who only submit sponsor content, as far as I'm concerned the rules should be harsher for that.

Bill I think that is what she is trying to say there seems to be a ton of submits of off series type stuff

The ones I'm specifically refering to are sponsor content and you are looking at a solo model in several "glamour" shots and then out of nowhere she's got a cock stuck in one orfice or another. To top it off she's gone from a backdrop to a bed/couch/carpet etc...
There is nothing other then it being the same girl to tie these images together.

People do that with TCG's content all of the time. TCG takes a shitload of pics of the chick posing against a wall or on a bed, then the guy comes in, then they start to go at. But submitters like to toss in a disproprotionate amount of the solo pics which are really out of context with the rest the set. No progression what-so-ever. Solo, solo, solo, solo, solo, solo, oh my god -there's a cock in my ass. The only solo shots that make sense on a hardcore free site are the after-the-fact tits dripping with goo pics, or the 'hi, my name is Larry, let's fuck' pics.

Heh, their heads can't be as big as TGP webmasters. ;)

I've always thought that my head is about averaged proportions to my body but then I am a tall size 14.

I agree with what has been said about telling a story. Clothed to naked with penetration with nothing in between isn't telling a story.

Hehe. I usually have to tell them a story just to get them naked. Penetration requires cash.

Absolutely! Some sort of a natural progression is what I think we'd all like to see.

For the first time, I'm using some TCG content on the sites I've got in the hopper. And yea, UW...that's exactly how the sets were set up. Lots of shots against a backdrop...then POOF...thar's a cock in that thar pussy! lol

Took some time to go though the sets culling images, but the end result does turn out ok...IF you take the time to go through em.

The interracial site I referenced earlier in this thread had no progression whatsoever. Submitted as interracial hardcore...with 1 gallery of the girl poolside. Next gallery, she's on a couch alone...3 pics later...there's a black cock involved. Certainly not an interracial hardcore site :(

|pokefun| Tarty..you must have been over the top to actually start a post..

|cool|