The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread
 

Please Post any questions about sites that were declined to the Link O'Rama in this thread.

Please do so after you have looked at this page, which explains things in a little more detail.

Please include the URL of your site & the reason it was rejected.

My apologies to those that posted in here before Jim decided to let a bot delete posts :D

There was Sy's that was resolved, another that had the content out of order (but the reason for rejection was incorrectly marked Site Structure Violation) and a 3rd that had vid caps (and you can tell they are vid caps because the pic quality is not that great & any movement shows up as a blur)

Your submission:

Horny Black Girl
http://www.dailypornopost.com/08-200...ree/index.html

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
1200 Rule


The pictures were all 1300+ height + width and I think your reviewer made a mistake.


I re-did the pictures to a larger size then re-uploaded them and would like to have the site re-reviewed without re-submitting it because I want to be able to submit the site I just finished tomorrow. Yes I am a re-tard.


P.s. I dont like rejection emails. Id rather not know.

Hey Greenie!

Actually I'm not sure if my sites were rejected, but I submitted them last week, they haven't been listed so far, but I also got no rejection mail!

URL's:

http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../poppornteens/
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../plushfuckers/

I'm a bit confused, because another one of my sites got listed, and I basically used the same template for the two above aswell. Just changed the colors & of course I now have 12 pix per gallery. Would be cool if you could have a look what's up with those sites, or if you're just some days behind with reviewing, ignore this post |thumb

WarBot - the truth shall set you free |buddy| It'll be in there with today's update (now don't you feel bad for picking on my new rules?)

OneWhoKnows:
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../poppornteens/ - I don't have a home for sites that have a mix of soft & hardcore - can't put it TeenNudes because she's having sex in the 2nd gallery, can't put it in TeenSex because the 1st gallery is just her naked.
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../plushfuckers/ - no idea on this one, so it'll be in there with the next update.

OK, thanks for the info Greenie. I'll keep that in mind for the next submission, so I don't mix up soft and hardcore anymore!

Got Declined Again (LOR)
 

Hi Greenie,

I got declined again for the reason "Lack of nudity". You should remember my site from yesterday's discussions:

http://www.camsescort.com/MagicFlyLiveCams/

I corrected everything we talked about and when I saw decline email this morning it almost killed me |cry|

I realize that my site doesn't have much nudity in it but the idea was to tease the user. If you agree with the decision of your reviewer can you tell me what the minimal nudity should be to get accepted on LOR?

Thanks
Cheetah

If you want to tease the surfer, then find non-nude link lists & tgp's to submit to.

Those pics would be tame if they were in Maxim.

No, I want to post in your LL |jester| So, can you explain what needs to be changed in my site to get listed in LOR?

Huh, I may have to start telling the truth more often... Nah! :)

Thanks Greenguy

Nudity would help. I don't have an exact number that I require, but SOME would be a good fucking start.

Shoot for 66-75% - 3-4 teaser pics followed by 8-9 pics of nipples & assholes & pussy lips.

A very smart guy told me something the other day that I think I will pass to you. Choose your content for the reviewer not the surfer. Most sales come from the index and main pages. Which the surfer will never see if you dont get listed.

That's a good advice. Looks like reviewer wasn't in a good mood when he was reviewing my site, because it was accepted already once on LOR. I'll try to get pictures of nipples & assholes & pussy lips from that chick to make reviewer happy |boobies| :D

IMO - that is an absolute crock of shit!

DD

I didnt think reviewers bought that much porn LOL

What about it do you disagree with and why?

why does the 1200 rule apply to movie images?
 

Hi greenguy and jim,

Im totally new to link lists, a week ago I thought they were called FGP's because they'd be freesite gallery pages lol.

I submitted this freesite and it was rejected
http://www.sexvps.com/fswild/blackfs1/index1.htm

it was rejected for the "1200" rule.
Now I can understand why you'd have that rule for images, but why would you have it for movie stills? |huh
That makes no sense.

lets look at one of the galleries:
http://sexvps.com/wildgals/blackwild2/wildblack2.html

those images are BIG, and pretty standard across the industry.
if you made them 700pixels on one side and 525 pixels on the other side they'd be WAY too big and too blurry, as most video slips dong go that size.

so I could submit galelries that size to you, but they would be blurry and would suck and your surfers would be like "this is garbage"

or I could submit galleries that are normal, that your surfers would enjoy.

By the way, can you point me out to Link Lists that would affect softcore free sites? Thanks!

sexvps - I think my reviewer selected the wrong reason - it was actually declined because the overall length of the movies is under 120 seconds.

By the way, can you point me out to Link Lists that would accept softcore free sites? Thanks!

cheetah - I have no idea.

Thanks Swedguy!

Well its your site and I appreciate that you let submitters voice their opinions, but those movies are 18 seconds each, and there are 6 of them.
The movies are large screen size and good quality.

I dont think your bookmarkers are going to look at the downloadable high quality 18 second movies and say "This linklist site sucks, they only gave me free 18 second movies and not 20 second movies."

I thought free sites were supposed to give away less than the tgps.
But its your site and you can do what you want. thanks for listening.

sexvps - well, let me run this past you: what should I cut it off at? It might only be 2 seconds/movie, but what if it was 4? That ok? How about 6? 10?

I have to cut it off someplace & 120 total is the current cutoff.