View Single Post
Old 2004-06-30, 07:09 AM   #4
Paul Markham2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by spazlabz
Not yet, but you can bet it will be. I love the part where if you run or manage an internet site you are considered a secondary producer. This is a little gem which means that everyone who has a single image on their sites better have a copy of their drivers license handy in case the men in black show up to inspect.. Just another example of how the justice department is aggressively going after the industry, and it's pretty hard to argue with this one since its sole purpose seems to be legitimizing whats being marketed.


spaz
The only ones who can argue with this are those who want to run an Amateur business. Let's face it we are pornographers, we put up pictures of people having sex, we need to be responsible.

Not just saying we have the address of someone who is the Custodian. How do we know the documents are there, how do we know we can get them and how do we know the models are 18+?

I know of photographers who have people selling their content on the net, content we rejected because of the documents.

Did you know one content provider gives a dead person as the Custodian of Records?
  Reply With Quote