Quote:
Originally posted by Greenguy
I'm gonna have to get with a lawyer on this, because if it's like the original 2257, which has this disclaimer:
"Some of the aforementioned depictions appearing or otherwise contained in or owned by Greenguy Marketing contain only visual depictions of actual sexually explicit conduct made before July 3, 1995, and, as such, are exempt from the requirements set forth in 18 USC 2257 and CFR 75."
The I'd have to assume that any content produced before today (or whatever day) would have a similar rule.
Now, with the cable company thing - the movies/programs they show have basically the same 2257 that we have on the websites & it's displayed before and/or after the show. So the cable company doesn't have the actual 2257 material, just a license & the info, as required by the old law.
So now, they'd have to have copies of all the performer's ID's & whatnot, which is a lot of paperwork 
|
GreenGuy, how do you know the content was produced before a certain date without documents?
I forgot the content provider told you it was. LOL
They may list someone else as the document holder, but to assume they publish without seeing the documents is so ludicrous it beggars belief. Please show an organisation run that badly, my lawyer is looking for work.