|
It's not that you watermark the content - we all understand that. It's that you watermark it with a different domain/site. Why not mark the 18 Years Old stuff with 18yearsold.com?
I know that as a reviewer, I often reject sites because the watermarks do not match the sites they are promoting. This goes along with your piracy problem. If the content is promoting the same site as the watermark, it's pretty safe to assume they they have permission to use it. But if it's different, how does the reviewer know that the submitter has the rights to use it? I don't have time to verify that it is ok to use - and in your case, I'd have no idea it was OK because the domain on the content is not part of the program. I'm sure I've declined sites for this reason in the last few weeks.
|