OK.. first off I have not 'rejected' anyone for any of these things... YET...!
Simon - spot on.. I meant the thumb that indicates the gallery link...
..and if some linklist is rejecting you for using it as a an internal link to a gallery and calling it "blind" they need their head clunked against the wall!
Sodo - thanks for putting your stuff out there.. and I am gonna give you my views on them so all can see
http://www.hornyebonygirl.com/hornyblackgirls/
This one is not all that bad... though it in essence breaks a few of the "guidelines" mentioned... IMO it flows quite clearly, the ads look like ads and the entrance looks like an entrance.. (the graphic font suck though and is hard to read
) - I would not reject this(based on the index page)
http://www.xtrafat.com/bighornywomen/
I would say the same about this one... it flows well and d is quite clear for the surfer - I would not reject this(based on the index page)
http://www.redhottranny.com/s/cock-slurping-geishas/
(Thanks HWulf)
Not too bad... the big header is IMO superfluous, and just extends the page... A header half that size would make the site "look" better IMO
.. and I think your enter link is OK.
If anyone else wants to toss a site up for critique... I will be kind and gentle as I pull them to pieces
9.
Flash embedded movies...
I personally don't see the big rush to flash as a necessity or a good thing.. but I can move with the times...
My problem with them is that sometimes they are not 'expandable' or 'adjustable' as a movie in a 'player' is... As a surfer that just freakin annoys me..
10.
Compression/Quality of content
I have seen a couple of sites where the content is just poor... over compressed, or badly compressed.. Yep I know sometimes that is all the dumb-ass sponsor will give you.... but there is plenty of good quality content around, and I don't think we/you should be using crappy content. Change sponsors!
DD