Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa
...I'm not yet convinced that we haven't been defrauded by a webmaster, but I'm more than prepared to be proven wrong...
|
That statement sums up the biggest issue I have with how this has been handled.
You've immediately assumed it was the webmaster that was responsible for the fraudulant signups and have placed the responsibilty on the webmaster to prove otherwise when it should be the other way around.
You should be the one proving that the IPs and emails involved are connected to the webmaster, as it's all but impossible for him to prove the negative.