Thread: Building a PC
View Single Post
Old 2005-11-26, 08:16 AM   #13
SirMoby
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
 
SirMoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJilla
In my career I've built about 1000 (no joke) PC's starting way back with the original 8086/8088's.
You're showing your age here. I too remember when the Kaypro 10 was launched and no one could figure out what you could possibly do with a lugable 10 Meg Drive.

I agree that I could end up wasting a bunch of time and since I'll be ordering everything on-line if I buy a combination that doesn't play well I could end up spending a huge amount of time here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJilla
Because gaming systems are designed to be the best, fastest, most out there PC's and a system that won't as quickly become obsolete.
That's not what I'm seeing from bench test results and that's why I mentioned my needs above.

While I see that the Athlon FX-57 and Pentium EE 840 gaming chips rock when doing a single process that doesn't require buffering such as running Half Life these chips don't perform even close to the dual core business chips when doing video compression or multitasking. If I built a gaming PC I'll need to replace it much sooner then if I build it to meet my business needs.

In fact in every benchmark I've seen the gaming chips are 10% to 15% faster at games but 20% slower at multitasking and video compression.
SirMoby is offline   Reply With Quote