hardcore content on warning page

[Tease]

I got a rejection letter today for the following freesite,
http://www.dailykay.com/dick-sucking-bitches/ba/

The reason: HARDCORE IMAGES on the warning page. A girl with white stuff on her face, barely visible is considered hardcore.
Come on.....

[MrBone]

That looks pretty visable to me.

I think bodily fluids are considered a no-no although many allow it.

|lightsabe

Good luck.

[dareutwo]

Some would allow it - some won't
Build 500 more sites, and it really won't matter.
I used to be very concerned with hardcore on the warning page, but have relaxed that rule over a year ago.
Those banners would pass with me. (but if his dick was in the banner - nope)

[Tease]

that's what I'm talking about, if there was a dick in there I would definitely consider it hardcore but it's just a chick with some white stuff on her face....oh well, live and learn

[Greenguy]

While I don't 100% agree with the reviewer, I do have to remind everyone of the "my site, my rules" clause that all link lists & tgp's have :)

[Surfn]

I would list it if it had my link. :)

[vangend]

If you mix icing suger and water it will look the same over her face :)

[Tease]

Thanx for the support GG :)


And Surfn, what is your link-site? I'd be glad to add you to my submission list

[Surfn]

Here (http://www.surfnsfreeadultlinks.com/cgi-bin/tgp/post.cgi) ya go, this is the submit.