View Full Version : So it's official. NATS programs might not give wm a credit for backup processor sales
daizzzy
2011-05-13, 01:36 AM
Congrats for all NATS affiliates |waves|
http://boyfriendbucks.com/external.php?page=terms&nats=
Signups as a result of second tier processors or discount offers after failure of initial payment attempt are not included in the commission program. Referrals using mobile phone devises are not included in the commission program, at this time.
it's a bunch of deecash programs now and fuck you cash program. and there's no way to spot it, just to run test joins. well done TMM
Only idiots send traffic to Dee programs.
Greenguy
2011-05-13, 11:12 AM
Why is this a NATS problem? NATS doesn't determine the programs TOS. And there's plenty of NATS programs to do perform those services.
It's the program that you should be bashing, not NATS
(look at me backing up NATS - lol)
Why is this a NATS problem?
Because the option to NOT credit affiliate sales from non-primary billers in a cascade has to be something that is built in to the NATS software. |club|
Greenguy
2011-05-13, 03:01 PM
Because the option to NOT credit affiliate sales from non-primary billers in a cascade has to be something that is built in to the NATS software. |club|I wonder if the old NATS was not set up to handle some of that stuff? Or, if it's an option, it's still the program's fault for using it.
terry
2011-05-13, 06:50 PM
This is just one of those life lessons. Move on.
faxxaff
2011-05-14, 01:28 PM
Why is this a NATS problem? NATS doesn't determine the programs TOS. And there's plenty of NATS programs to do perform those services.
It's the program that you should be bashing, not NATS
(look at me backing up NATS - lol)
Didn't TMM once claim shaving was impossible with NATS?
Greenguy
2011-05-14, 05:07 PM
This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.
This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.
Well..... that just makes it "legalized" shaving. The ethics are still shady.
But, those programs using this "feature" don't exactly have stellar reputations for ethics anyway. So, anyone pushing them really doesn't have much room to complain.
bluemoney
2011-05-14, 10:22 PM
Only idiots send traffic to Dee programs.
Congrats to Cleo, this years winner of "The gospel in 7 words or less award" |thumb
faxxaff
2011-05-15, 03:43 AM
This isn't exactly "shaving" It's the program's TOS/policy.
I am not familiar with this particular sponsor at all (but it's surrounded by super-shady people, isn't it), but I do know one thing: most programs change TOS silently behind the back of their partners. When you sign up you are promised heaven and to be credited for all sales. When sales numbers and ratios start to deteriorate, people are being confronted with 'changed TOS'.
daizzzy
2011-05-15, 04:00 AM
Well..... that just makes it "legalized" shaving. The ethics are still shady.
what he said
Greenguy
2011-05-15, 05:54 PM
Anyone that thinks there's not shaving built into EVERY program is just kidding themselves.
Voltar
2011-05-15, 06:14 PM
Anyone that thinks there's not shaving built into EVERY program is just kidding themselves.
Ditto on what GG said...been that way for years and years...if you look long enough you can see signs of it most everywhere..including mainstream...not just adult..
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.