View Full Version : AdultFriendFinder intends to keep Jays-xxx-links a linklist!
xxxjay
2009-12-03, 09:31 PM
Good news for submitters, AFF intends to keep jays xxx as a linklist. I Have been consulting for them, I explained the whole free site deal, and they are down for keeping it as is.
Not bad for the evil empire, no?
That's good.
When is the transition to new management?
xxxjay
2009-12-03, 11:43 PM
That's good.
When is the transition to new management?
In process now.
can whoever will review join this board or at least if we could get an email or icq or something. I just don't want to submit to a list I never get listed on.
Glad it's sticking around though.
Not bad for the evil empire, no?
But they're still the evil empire. |pissleft|
Max@PuZcash.com
2009-12-04, 05:11 AM
good that it'S not turning into a tube site...
smutguy
2009-12-04, 12:49 PM
Good news for submitters, AFF intends to keep jays xxx as a linklist. I Have been consulting for them, I explained the whole free site deal, and they are down for keeping it as is.
Not bad for the evil empire, no?
will it be open submits for everyone?
will they be giving out partner accounts?
will it be open submits for everyone?
will they be giving out partner accounts?
Ultimately those are questions for the new management. Altho I had the same questions.
We'll just have to see. No way to know how it will be managed.
Daniel_webcams
2009-12-10, 11:08 AM
nice design you have there :)
Linkster
2010-01-25, 04:38 PM
Too bad they pulled all the link trades and have the link pages 301'd to other pages now
That's really no surprise. I figured it was inevitable.
I can just see the aff goons now, thinking, "these trades make no sense, everything must now point to US!".
I expected they would just nod when jay explained how a linklist worked, then fuck everyone the minute jay was out of the room.
Linkster
2010-01-25, 06:51 PM
Interestingly - they do have link pages - just not at the same URLs that we all linked to - and of course they couldnt have had our traffic go to the niche link pages - but instead go to big ad pages
Oh well - just more links to pull |jester|
GonZo
2010-01-26, 09:22 AM
Interestingly - they do have link pages - just not at the same URLs that we all linked to - and of course they couldnt have had our traffic go to the niche link pages - but instead go to big ad pages
Oh well - just more links to pull |jester|
Does that mean you wont be participating in the IPO?
Linkster
2010-01-26, 07:45 PM
Does that mean you wont be participating in the IPO?
Since they havent been smart enough to figure out a way to monetize mobile on iphone and android and supply apps I would say emphatically NO
If a company actually does start supplying either apps with some sort of social porn sites or at least come out with a developers kit that works, I'd buy so many shares they would spin :)
GonZo
2010-01-27, 06:58 AM
Since they havent been smart enough to figure out a way to monetize mobile on iphone and android and supply apps I would say emphatically NO
If a company actually does start supplying either apps with some sort of social porn sites or at least come out with a developers kit that works, I'd buy so many shares they would spin :)
So I take it the noise Top Bucks has been making about mobile is also unimpressive as well?
Wonder how many cross sales they will try to slam mobile users with?
Linkster
2010-01-27, 08:07 AM
So I take it the noise Top Bucks has been making about mobile is also unimpressive as well?
Wonder how many cross sales they will try to slam mobile users with?
Actually they are the closest to a good beginning I've seen - and the recent press they got from Conan doesnt hurt |jester|
GonZo
2010-01-27, 08:23 AM
Actually they are the closest to a good beginning I've seen - and the recent press they got from Conan doesnt hurt |jester|
From where I sit everything that Ive seen is 5 years behind the times.
2010 is the year of the app... redesigning your site to be mobile browser friendly isnt very awe inspiring.
And honestly... for our business people chasing inclusion in the Apple's App store by trying to sneak porn thru the back door are wasting their time. Jobs has made it clear he doesnt want the Iphone used to enable people to get their jerk on.
Bank on android.
Google understands and wisely welcomes this industry where others have resisted to some degree. The way we were treated in Yahoo's office vs Googles is the difference between night and day.
Far-L
2010-02-23, 03:00 PM
From where I sit everything that Ive seen is 5 years behind the times.
2010 is the year of the app... redesigning your site to be mobile browser friendly isnt very awe inspiring.
And honestly... for our business people chasing inclusion in the Apple's App store by trying to sneak porn thru the back door are wasting their time. Jobs has made it clear he doesnt want the Iphone used to enable people to get their jerk on.
Bank on android.
Google understands and wisely welcomes this industry where others have resisted to some degree. The way we were treated in Yahoo's office vs Googles is the difference between night and day.
How so? Can you elaborate? Both have certainly gone after their share of adult sales over the years.
And honestly... for our business people chasing inclusion in the Apple's App store by trying to sneak porn thru the back door are wasting their time. Jobs has made it clear he doesnt want the Iphone used to enable people to get their jerk on.
Build interactive iPhone websites using html5 and then Apple has no say so over your app. This is what Google did for Google Voice.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.