what's considered "hardcore" on a warning page?

[sickkittens]

Would a dick-to-mouth be considered hardcore?

[Surfn]

Depends if it's his own dick...

[Cleo]

Are we talking about the penis of a farm animal?






Actually I don't care if you put hardcore on your warning page since they are coming from my list.

[amadman]

I consider that hardcore.

Mouth or tongue touching genitals, penetration of any kind, sexual fluids ect.....

[Greenguy]

I was told by an editor at Dmoz that "hardcore" is anything between 2 people OR one person with toys.

Naked girl standing along - softcore

Naked girl with dildo in her twat - hardcore

[Greenguy]

Oops - forgot to mention that Dmoz really means nothing to me, but this thread made me remember being told that :D

[T Pat]

Originally posted by Surfn
Depends if it's his own dick... |jester|
Best laugh of the day good one Surfin|cheers|

[Wazza]

Originally posted by Surfn
Depends if it's his own dick... What if it's no longer attached to his body - does that make it ok?

[DangerDave]

IMO - Any penetration is hardcore... fingers,toys,dicks whatever..

DD

[Cleo]

Well how about if it is the penis of a whale?

[balas]

Originally posted by Wazza
What if it's no longer attached to his body - does that make it ok?


in my opisnion its very hardcore |rasta|

[amadman]

Originally posted by Greenguy
I was told by an editor at Dmoz that "hardcore" is anything between 2 people OR one person with toys.

Naked girl standing along - softcore

Naked girl with dildo in her twat - hardcore

The thing about Dmoz though is they are only trying to classify it and are not really considering legal issues.

[1freepornfinder]

Originally posted by amadman
I consider that hardcore.

Mouth or tongue touching genitals, penetration of any kind, sexual fluids ect.....

amadman hit the nail on the head .... IMHO

[Surfn]

Hardcore is subjective. So lighten up folks. |bananna| |haha

[amadman]

Originally posted by Surfn
Hardcore is subjective. So lighten up folks. |bananna| |haha

Thats what makes it scary |jester|

[1freepornfinder]

very scary.....

[xxxjay]

i had to stop submitting my ***HIGH PR*** sites to 1freepornfinder because my banners are served from a bannerserver and i have no control over what that banner will be when he reviews it

[amadman]

lol xxxjay.... I think he would want the banners to be softcore all the time not just when he reviews it. |jester|

[1freepornfinder]

Jay..... you know I want your sites... and we have many trades that I value..... but I paid too much for that lawyer to review everything to not listen to his advice.... a warning page shouldn't contain hardcore.... (at least as long as Bush is in office)

[ChristyB]

As I understand it (and as I apply it) the law about what constitutes content which is 'hardcore/adult' (and should therefore be 'protected' by a warning on a prior page) is equal to the law which says what can be displayed on the front cover of a magazine that can be displayed on a shop shelf without the use of a 'censor bag'...

So no penetration, hard cocks, cumshots, spread pussy etc etc...

I'm sure it doesn't apply to every country but I'm pretty certain that it applies to the us and uk.

...and there is a linklist out there with very hardcore recip banners (gaping pussy dripping cum) that 'ought to be' treated as hardcore content (I can't remember which right now).