What free sites do you guys want?

[justbondage]

Are there any particular categories that you LL owners would like free site builders to submit more of?

[Licker4U]

Yes, hairy pussy and squirting

[Tekster]

Shemale, for women, hairy, big cock, and squirting

[papagmp]

I almost always post them in 2 to 3 cats if they fit but I need

Sisters and Twins
Daughter (mother daughter, father pimping daughter etc - no 1nce$t please)
Camel Toe
Piercings
Tattoos & Inksluts
Revenge / Grudge-Fuck
Bi-sexual MMF

Also - if you have two (or more) galleries and you use different models or shoots, if you keep all the models/shoots similar - such as

outdoor
teen
milf
mature
big tits
perky tits
shaved
hairy
blond
brunette
redhead

etc.....

I can list you in more cats.

And I really don't give a shit where the recip points - as long as it's to the Outlaw Free Porn somewhere. main.html is a good start |thumb

[LD]

midgets, panties, strapon, femdom


and anything else....:)

[pc]

foot fetish , femdom , squirting

[AngelMia]

Thing about the girls ;-)

[Vivaldi]

I had a thread here about what cattegories at my places needed a bit more free sites submited ... too bad I stopped doing that :-(
now ... Luscious combination is ok by me :-)
midgets, panties, strapon, femdom

[NY Jester]

Interracial One Eyed Midget Lesbian Hardcore...very very micro. |jester|

[Cleo]

Right to life pregnant transsexuals screwing republicans.

[Star Man]

Sites with my recip on it!|bow|

[Mateusz]

I'd love to see more sites in the following categories femdom, foot fetish, for women, indian, petite, uniform, voyeur (real - not party or similar crap). I also have only few sites, besides the ones I built myself, in hair color fetish categories: blonde, brunette, redhead.



|spam|

If there are any affiliate programs having such paysites in portfolio I'd be more than happy to build some HFS for a small fee :)
Well, ok.. actually I could build hfs for any paysite |whisper|
Just let me know if you are interested

[Useless]

I may have categories that have far fewer links listed than others, but that doesn't concern me at all, so I'm going to take this time to semi-hijack this thread.

Vary your niches. As the world's premiere link reviewer, I find it extremely annoying to see any single submitter constantly submitting to the same category day after day. I know it's a royal pain in the ass to switch gears when you've found a niche the works well for you, or one that particularly inspires your creativity. But no link list wants to allow any individual submitter to dominate any single category. If you must rip out 10 free sites aimed for the same category, do not submit them 10 days in a row.

Quality. I really enjoy listing free sites that are more than just the same old template, 3 standard links out to a sponsor, and quickly chosen content. I have a handful of submitters who produce free sites of a caliber that I consider to be way ahead of their competitors, and those sites actually make everyone else's sites a total bore to review. That handful of builders obviously takes more time selecting content, writing sales text and basically filling almost every square inch of their sites. They are masters of ad layout, really take advantage of space in order to push traffic to their sponsor/hub/link list, and are not afraid to be creative, or even shocking, with their text. They usually work 3-4 niches strongly and occasionally test the waters of another. Also, their submitted descriptions show that they know their niche AND that they've read the descriptions on a link list or two over the years and know what actually gets published on a link list instead of some bunch of garbled hypothetical nonsense that barely even pertains to the site they've submitted.

[CaptainJSparrow]

Useless Warrior has a good point about varying your niches...if you can do it (I realize that some webmasters only focus on certain niches) that'd be great.

For debauchery, the movies section, blowjobs, cumshots, foot fetish, and pussy licking (this one is wide open...hardly any submitters to it) are the least submitted to categories.

[Greenguy]

Seeing as Murray and MrMaryLou review most of the submits, I'd personally like to see a lot of gay, shemale & bisexual sites submitters to the Link O'Rama.

...too bad Emerald no longer reviews for me - otherwise we could fill her up with Cumshot sites. (linger 7+ years!)

[Kristine]

And for the girls? give us some

[Useless]

Thing about the girls ;-)
And for the girls? give us someWHICH LINK LISTS DO EITHER OF YOU OWN?

[papagmp]

WHICH LINK LISTS DO EITHER OF YOU OWN?

Nice Useless - I was thinking the same thing. Maybe they don't realize that most of us work 16+ hour days and come here for real business related information and not a bunch of extraneous BS. That's what the chat forum is for.

Of course - if they were freesite submitters and had a related question...... naaa, that would make too much sense.

[Kristine]

Im new in this. I respect what U do and I hope I can learn a lot from U. Everybody was a newbie once. So that's why I asked coz there are girlz too and I need as much information that I can get.
Thx

[Licker4U]

Im new in this. I respect what U do and I hope I can learn a lot from U. Everybody was a newbie once. So that's why I asked coz there are girlz too and I need as much information that I can get.
Thx

I didn't see you ask for any information |huh

[Kristine]

That's because I have to read the forum first. I already saw some nice 1st sites of some guys. I told U Im newbie so I don't want to post stupid questions.

[Star Man]

Kristine if you want people to take you seriously,consider not substituting the word 'you' for the letter 'U' and using it every other sentence.Theres nothing 'cute' or 'hip' about it and it makes you appear below average intelligence.

[bDok]

I'd like to just see more submits from quality webmasters on this board. Things are picking up for sure, but more is always nice. :)

Cheers,
bDok

[Pagan]

Mr. Useless, could you enlighten some of us with an example or two of the types of sites you are speaking of, both brilliant and lame? Quality is always in the eye of the beholder, but even us blind folks can be taught a little. bDok, same question, as it really does give us ideas. Thanks, guys!

[justbondage]

If one site is put up as an example of awesome, surely the next batch of submits are likely to be clones of it?

[papagmp]

If one site is put up as an example of awesome, surely the next batch of submits are likely to be clones of it?

So true - LOL

Just surf the various LL's - you'll be able to tell the the bad, good and awesome sites real quick.

[justbondage]

So basically, when said site does get posted - everyone fuck off, I have dibs!

[Pagan]

So true - LOL

Just surf the various LL's - you'll be able to tell the the bad, good and awesome sites real quick.

See, that's why I posted my question the way I did. I have been surfing various sites for ideas, and I am having a hard time telling. I see blind links all over, sites that I know are straight from the sponsors, and tons of sites that I have a hard time finding gallery links through all the text and huge banners. I know that trends change in free sites, but.. when I look at a dozen or so of the newly listed sites on almost any LL and see these kinds of things, I begin to get confused. Yes, I do realize some of these may be the LL owner's sites, but, shouldn't they also meet the "rules" of that LL?

As to templates and lack of originality? How original is it to slap up a downloaded sponsor site and pass it off as your work? Site after site built with the same forumlas... kinda boring really. Even the content on what I surfed was ho-hum. Is this really what you guys want?

Heck, even if you pm me a couple without telling me what is what, it helps retrain these old eyes. Maybe today's surfers and LL owners want those cluttery sites. When I first started building freesites 10 years ago, the style was cluttery but with sponsor banners. Now it is huge text that screams out with tiny, almost invisible links to the content.

[Useless]

Mr. Useless, could you enlighten some of us with an example or two of the types of sites you are speaking of, both brilliant and lame? Quality is always in the eye of the beholder, but even us blind folks can be taught a little.I'm Mr. Useless now, huh? ;)

Justbondage hit the nail on the head. The chances of me posting links to what I consider to be the best free sites are pretty much the same as someone who writes really good sales text will post in this thread (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48880). Also, just because I look at them and think they're great, doesn't mean that they are producing tons of sales.

Let's face it - one of the suckier parts of this business is that your work is out there for all of your competition to see. If you come up with something that is brilliant, any fool can come along and copy it. I think one of the keys to doing well is to not share everything on boards. Whether there is a correlation or not, I do not know, but I will tell you that the people I consider to be the best submitters are all members here and they hardly ever post. So, anyway, I share their work with surfers - not webmasters. :)

[papagmp]

See, that's why I posted my question the way I did. I have been surfing various sites for ideas, and I am having a hard time telling. I see blind links all over, sites that I know are straight from the sponsors, and tons of sites that I have a hard time finding gallery links through all the text and huge banners. I know that trends change in free sites, but.. when I look at a dozen or so of the newly listed sites on almost any LL and see these kinds of things, I begin to get confused. Yes, I do realize some of these may be the LL owner's sites, but, shouldn't they also meet the "rules" of that LL?

As to templates and lack of originality? How original is it to slap up a downloaded sponsor site and pass it off as your work? Site after site built with the same forumlas... kinda boring really. Even the content on what I surfed was ho-hum. Is this really what you guys want?

Heck, even if you pm me a couple without telling me what is what, it helps retrain these old eyes. Maybe today's surfers and LL owners want those cluttery sites. When I first started building freesites 10 years ago, the style was cluttery but with sponsor banners. Now it is huge text that screams out with tiny, almost invisible links to the content.


All my sites are perfect |jester|

As you surf various LL's, remember that we list hosted FS's and galleries with our affiliate codes in them - this is how we justify the work of maintaining an LL - so some of the sites ma indeed be sponsor's hosted stuff.

Bottom line, if you can see these things that are wrong, you ware well on the way to becoming a better FS builder.

[Pagan]

I'm Mr. Useless now, huh? ;)

Justbondage hit the nail on the head. The chances of me posting links to what I consider to be the best free sites are pretty much the same as someone who writes really good sales text will post in this thread (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48880). Also, just because I look at them and think they're great, doesn't mean that they are producing tons of sales.

Let's face it - one of the suckier parts of this business is that your work is out there for all of your competition to see. If you come up with something that is brilliant, any fool can come along and copy it. I think one of the keys to doing well is to not share everything on boards. Whether there is a correlation or not, I do not know, but I will tell you that the people I consider to be the best submitters are all members here and they hardly ever post. So, anyway, I share their work with surfers - not webmasters. :)

Hey, can't a lady show some respect around here? Or do I have to go find that discarded tennis racket?

My clean sites don't bring the kind of sales I want yet, even though I am working my fingers off to be listed. Building trust and traffic is part of it, yes, and the sales will come as I get better known. The fact that my accepts far out number my rejects is a positive sign. I also noticed my traffic for month to date is now ahead of all of July, so I am on the right track.

Obviously, you guys need sites in certain niches, and don't need sites in others. You also don't need just any sites, you want quality, as a wise man said. Just trying to help build what y'all need here.

Still... I won't tell anyone if I get a pm with a couple of URLs. You don't have to tell me what is good and what isn't.. I should know, right? RIGHT! ah.. I hear a hairy bush calling me....

[elKabong]

The chances of me posting links to what I consider to be the best free sites are pretty much the same as someone who writes really good sales text will post in this thread (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48880).

Hmmm, although I get your point, I don't necessarily agree with your statement.

I'd like to think that I write great sales text, but I agree that I wouldn't spoon feed someone, rather, I'd point them in the right direction and give them the opportunity to figure it out for themselves.

If everybody were to just lurk and never share any ideas, what's the point of this community?

[justbondage]

If everybody were to just lurk and never share any ideas, what's the point of this community?

I think his point is that there is a difference between sharing ideas and posting a statement like "this is the best design for a free site - LINK".

It would be like, there is no sharing there, just an ask and receive system.

[Useless]

Hmmm, although I get your point, I don't necessarily agree with your statement.

I'd like to think that I write great sales text, but I agree that I wouldn't spoon feed someone, rather, I'd point them in the right direction and give them the opportunity to figure it out for themselves.|smooch| I officially have no idea what you are not agreeing with.

If everybody were to just lurk and never share any ideas, what's the point of this community?Ah. You know what your problem is? You aren't jaded yet. ;)

Here's the thing. I used to enjoy helping newbies and I'll still occasionally pop into a newbie thread to redirect it if I see someone is getting shit advice or an important fact is being left out. Do you know why I bother to do that? Because it'll make me look smart and experienced to some poor schmuck who doesn't know the truth; the reality that I'm nothing more than an angry little man who can't make things work, will never truly succeed in this business. So I make myself feel better by unleashing criticism and a torrent of explicatives on idiots who couldn't possibly put up a good defense in a battle of words against a guy like me - a wannabe English professor who'd rather wallow in self-pity and self-hatred than build the motivation to go back to school.

[tigermom]

Seeing as Murray and MrMaryLou review most of the submits, I'd personally like to see a lot of gay, shemale & bisexual sites submitters to the Link O'Rama.[/SIZE]

Would have thought more LL owners would mention gay. I need to take the time and run a few more gay FS soon enough.

[elKabong]

I officially have no idea what you are not agreeing with..

I'm agreeing with myself of course, somebody has to... or maybe I'm not agreeing with myself, or maybe... I don't know anymore, I'm so confused... |shocking|

lol


Here's the thing. I used to enjoy helping newbies and I'll still occasionally pop into a newbie thread to redirect it if I see someone is getting shit advice or an important fact is being left out. Do you know why I bother to do that? Because it'll make me look smart and experienced to some poor schmuck who doesn't know the truth; the reality that I'm nothing more than an angry little man who can't make things work, will never truly succeed in this business. So I make myself feel better by unleashing criticism and a torrent of explicatives on idiots who couldn't possibly put up a good defense in a battle of words against a guy like me - a wannabe English professor who'd rather wallow in self-pity and self-hatred than build the motivation to go back to school.

I knew it... |jester|

[1freepornfinder]

Seeing as Murray and MrMaryLou review most of the submits, I'd personally like to see a lot of gay, shemale & bisexual sites submitters to the Link O'Rama.

...too bad Emerald no longer reviews for me - otherwise we could fill her up with Cumshot sites. (linger 7+ years!)

I agree.. I need more gay & bisexual sites.... even to my gay site... ;)

[Simon]

The chances of me posting links to what I consider to be the best free sites are pretty much the same as someone who writes really good sales text will post in this thread (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48880).
Bite me.
|jester|

[Useless]

Bite me.
|jester|Consider yourself bitten. |smooch|

[Pagan]

oooh, can we pick where????