PDA

View Full Version : "Y---g (Blank)" Sponsors on Freesites?


Buncha
2008-05-16, 09:34 PM
What's the general LL rule for promoting sponsors that use the word "y---g" in the site's name? I was under the impression that the term was banned outright, and I've always avoided it. But maybe I was wrong.

Is it alright to promote a legal 2257-compliant sponsor like "Y---g Models", "Y---g Busty", "Old-n-Y---g", etc? Or should any site that uses the word be avoided?

Thanks for the input.

Dave

Bill
2008-05-16, 09:44 PM
Depends on the linklist.

There are a few that don't allow it.

Some don't allow it in site names.

Most do, but don't allow it in combination with certain other words.

y**ng girl and y**ng boy is nearly universally banned.

There's enough of a prohibition for those that I decided to censor them here.

SheepGuy
2008-05-16, 09:53 PM
I prefer titles like "not quite ancient girls", or "not old bags".
Just makes me feel safer :D

Useless
2008-05-19, 05:09 PM
Supreme Court Upholds Law Aimed at Child Pornography (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/20/washington/19cnd-scotus.html?hp)

Monday’s decision in United States v. Williams reinstated the conviction of Michael Williams of Florida, who was caught in a federal undercover operation in April 2004 and found guilty later of “pandering” child pornography, a charge defined in part as promoting or distributing real or “purported” material in a way that reflects the belief — or is intended to persuade another — that the material is indeed child pornography.

Greenguy
2008-05-19, 05:11 PM
Even with Useless's post, I still say it depends on the word(s) before & after it.

Useless is older than me, but in terms of online work, he's a young webmaster :)

Useless
2008-05-19, 05:22 PM
Useless is older than me, but in terms of online work, he's a young webmaster :)I'm one month older and I shave all of my gray hairs off!

I posted that article because I just read it on my Google homepage (or whatever they call it). I accept sites promoting Young Models and similar sites. I will scan a site for deliberately misleading text, but I'm far less attentive to the issue than in years past. As long as I don't think the submitter is deliberately attempting to portray the models as younger than legal, I'm cool with it, especially if they are wicked sexy - the model, not the submitter.