Generate traffic to my site

[r3n3gad3]

Hi,

I've setup hardlinks but I'm not getting much traffic from that... (max 10 uniques a day..)

Can you guys help me out to drive traffic to my site (bozporn.com) ?

|santa|

[Greenguy]

Trade more links.

Buy traffic.

Build & submit sites/galleries that promote your site.

Look at your site in IE7 (I can't read the text up top)

[r3n3gad3]

Look at your site in IE7 (I can't read the text up top)

yeah I know, that's a bit of a problem, my site looks crappy in IE7 but is looks good in all the other browsers... |cleo|

[dexcool]

I put some of your FHG's in my TGP, that might help some, I am gonna buy some traffic soon but it seems that bought traffic is crap (at least the cheap traffic) Hope it helps.

P.s. you need some more banners.

[Bobc01]

It doesn't look right in firefox either, text is too big and the top menu isn't displayed.

[r3n3gad3]

It doesn't look right in firefox either, text is too big and the top menu isn't displayed.

on what resolution Bobc01?

[r3n3gad3]

I put some of your FHG's in my TGP, that might help some, I am gonna buy some traffic soon but it seems that bought traffic is crap (at least the cheap traffic) Hope it helps.

P.s. you need some more banners.

thnx dexcool I'll start posting soon |thumb

[Bobc01]

on what resolution Bobc01?

1280x1024, it's anoying when something looks ok in one browser and completely different in another.

Firefox seems to be the worst for that.

[r3n3gad3]

1280x1024, it's anoying when something looks ok in one browser and completely different in another.

Firefox seems to be the worst for that.

that's wierd... |huh I don't see any difference on my site in different browsers... can you send me a screen shot if you can find the time for it? It will help me very much!

mail it to: webmaster [at] bozporn [dot] com

[Bobc01]

This is how firefox 2.0.0.11 sees it..

[r3n3gad3]

This is how firefox 2.0.0.11 sees it..

who thats wird it doesn't loads the style.css ... |huh

Edit, can you check again, I've changed some very littly things (dots) there were some guys telling me on the web that that could be the prob...

[Bobc01]

It still appears the same in firefox, unless theres something disabled in my browser as it's running default config.

[Simon]

Gotta be careful of errors anywhere in your code if you're going to use a doctype of xhtml strict. Not sure what's causing the problem but this might be a place to start.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.bozporn.com/


ADDED: And that never-ending exit chain linked to your 'e-mags' navigation tab isn't going to help you get any bookmarkers.



.

[Bobc01]

Weird thing about using doctypes is nearly every site you try and validate produces tons of errors.

Is it really needed in sites?

[r3n3gad3]

Weird thing about using doctypes is nearly every site you try and validate produces tons of errors.

Is it really needed in sites?

Yeah but I think there is something to worry about...

# Line 23, column 7: XML Parsing Error: Opening and ending tag mismatch: link line 13 and head

</head>


somebody understands this?

[Simon]

Weird thing about using doctypes is nearly every site you try and validate produces tons of errors. Is it really needed in sites?
Yes, the doctype declaration is important. If you're not going to follow the strict rules, you can always use HTML 4.01 Transitional instead of HTML 4.01 Strict, and you can use XHTML 1.0 Transitional instead of XHTML 1.0 Strict. If you're getting "tons of errors" then now would be a good time to begin validating all your pages and learning how to write valid html code that doesn't throw errors.

somebody understands this?

Sure, actually many bodies understands. :)

Seriously, if you're not up to writing strict XHTML code, then just don't do it. You may want to consider dropping back to a doctyle of XHTML 1.0 Transitional or HTML 4.01 Transitional to avoid having so many errors.

Your problem seems to have begun on line 6, where you didn't close an element/tag. If you're going to be using XHTML then you need to be aware that you have to close some tags you may not have been used to closing in earlier HTML versions. XHTML uses self-closing elements, so things like your META tags should end with "/>" instead of ">".

Some reading on doctypes:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/doctype/
http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp

HTH


.

[Bobc01]

Good info there Simon thanks. |thumb

[r3n3gad3]

Yes, the doctype declaration is important. If you're not going to follow the strict rules, you can always use HTML 4.01 Transitional instead of HTML 4.01 Strict, and you can use XHTML 1.0 Transitional instead of XHTML 1.0 Strict.

[...]

Some reading on doctypes:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/doctype/
http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp
.

Now this is the reply I needed, thank you Simon |thumb

[r3n3gad3]

Can someone check again, Bobc01... I've made some changes

[dexcool]

looks better for me, I use firefox. The "our newest girls" does not have anything in it in firefox.

Looked at in in IE and it looked good but I got an error, also when you mouse over the first set of links they change color and the links do not work.

[Bobc01]

As above with IE but unfortunately still the same in firefox.

[r3n3gad3]

As above with IE but unfortunately still the same in firefox.

Can you both be so kind to post a screenshot?

And Bobc01 can you check out:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=208/208.css

If you have the same problems there as you have with my site then it has something to do with your settings... If you don't then I know how to fix the problem |bananna|

[Bobc01]

Can you both be so kind to post a screenshot?

And Bobc01 can you check out:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=208/208.css

If you have the same problems there as you have with my site then it has something to do with your settings... If you don't then I know how to fix the problem |bananna|

No problems with the csszengarden site, looks perfect in both browsers.

This site may help http://browsershots.org/

[r3n3gad3]

No problems with the csszengarden site, looks perfect in both browsers.

This site may help http://browsershots.org/

Ok, then it is in my code... Did you check my site also today? I made some minor changes that could be the problem...

I already used browsershots.org, thats why I was so confused |confused|

http://browsershots.org/http://www.bozporn.com/

[blogman]

more links!!!