PDA

View Full Version : search engines and folders


buttster
2007-05-12, 05:59 AM
Looking for opinions on how deep to really go structuring folders for the search engines. Does it really do any good to lets say structure folders with different keywords, example:
is it better to use the following: ps: these urls do not exist, LOL

http://bigtitgirls.net/big-tits/blonde-with-giant-hooters/index.html
versus
http://bigtitgirls.net/big-tits-blonde-with-giant-hooters/index.html

Halfdeck
2007-05-13, 05:28 AM
Does it really do any good

It'll help you rank for keywords that pull 1 hit a month.

these urls do not exist, LOL

Then I suggest breaking up the urls or wrapping them in quotes.

buttster
2007-05-13, 05:51 AM
I need to make myself clearer:
is it better for search engines to have most of your free site urls 1 folder deep as:

"domain.com/big-tits-blonde-sucking-hard-little-cock/index.html"

versus having them 2 folders deep:

"domain.com/big-tits/blondes/sucking-hard-little-cock/index.html"

any opinions appreciated

Halfdeck
2007-05-13, 06:23 AM
I need to make myself clearer: is it better for search engines to have most of your free site urls 1 folder deep as:

You were clear enough the first time.

It doesn't matter, unless you're going apeshit stuffing your url with millions of keywords, then you'll probably trip a flag.

In general, folder depth does not matter.

Here it is straight from Google:

typically the depth of the directory doesn’t make any difference for us; PageRank is a much larger factor. So without knowing your site, I’d look at trying to make sure that your site is using your PageRank well. A tree structure with a certain fanout at each level is usually a good way of doing it.

To Google, 99% of on-page optimizations have 1% of boosting ranking and 99% chance of hurting you.

If you want higher rankings, you hunt links.

P.S. Thanks for using quotes :)