GG I havn't been getting listed ? ...

[dubb]

As of late I have not been getting list for some reason and I was wondering if you could tell me why. I have submitted 2 in in the past month 1 as far back as Dec 23. which was http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/ and I don't recall getting listed for that one or a more recent one http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/voyeur/ that was submitted on Jan 3. Then there was one more that was submitted but that was more recent like about a week now so I took that as you just not getting around to it yet since your probably packed as it is. If you could get back to be I would apresiate it . Thanks

[swedguy]

I don't know why he didn't list you. But here's couple of things I saw that would probably not get you listed....

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3664

Free Tips #1: The index page lacks a complete body tag

You also have a Porn Inspector recip: http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3348&

[Greenguy]

I could have been the Porn Inspector links (which the issue with them has been resolved)

On the voyeur site, I would have kicked it back because that 1st gallery is cleary not voyeur (unless the girl is blind)

On the anal site, the ad on this gallery - http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - is a FPA in my book :(

[dubb]

On the voyeur site, I would have kicked it back because that 1st gallery is clearly not voyeur (unless the girl is blind)
For the voyeur site I thought that upskirt and voyeur are in the same category because if you look at the the sponsors site they have both upskirt and voyeur on it which is where I got both contents from. If you don't go by that then my fault didn't know.


On the anal site, the ad on this gallery - http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - is a FPA in my book
I don't see how that is a full page ad because if you look and click the images each is a thumbnail which goes to a full jpg picture.They are just cut into different styles for the effect of the gallery style. The only thing that is linked to the sponsor is the text under it.


I could have been the Porn Inspector links (which the issue with them has been resolved)
Hmm k I read something about that but i'm still not sure about it. So is a Porn Inspector link acceptable or not just for the record so I don't make that mistake again?

Thanks for your quick response and I will try to fix the problems you said in my up coming sites.

[dubb]

Thanks swedguy for the link to that post it was very helpful.

[Greenguy]

http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/voyeur/gal8.html - pics of a girl in the bath tub while the camera is moving around the room is NOT voyeur in my book. This is a voyeur page: http://www.chestyamateurs.com/spying/3101900831.html :)

http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - my bad on that one - it looked like those images up top were ads - sorry :(

& you can link to Porn Inspector if you want, but doing so does you no good what-so-ever. If you want to give traffic away for free, be my guest :)

[dubb]

Well I can understand that but I can only work with the content they gave me. So I will be more critical in how I pick my pictures from now on. Thanks again for your help.

[DangerDave]

dubb,

Your site is free-hosted ? yes?

DD

[dubb]

No DD my site is not free hosted. My friend is starting his reseller hosting program from www interquad dot net and I am signed up to him.