Three Gallery Free Sites

[jonnydoe]

Do any LLs not accept these?

I can see where they would be more of a challenge with content but you would also have more advertising real estate.

What are some opinions on the advantages/disadvantages?

[Greenguy]

I accept them, as long as their's still 12 pics per gallery (otherwise, people would submit 3 gallery sites with 8 pics per page or 4 gallery sites with 6 pics per page)

It is a lot of content, but you are right that it does give you another page of ads, so it's really up to you.

[MrYum]

No problemos here with 3 gallery sites :)

[dareutwo]

Fine with me

[alessandro]

I list them too, thought I'd be curios how's traffic that comes off that type of free sites converting, because IMHO 3 galleries means to much content given away for free.

[JustRobert]

I have no problems with 3 gallery sites as well :)

[Simon]

Sometime in 2007, the 3-gallery free site will become the minimum accepted at one or more link lists.

|couch|

[Greenguy]

Sometime in 2007, the 3-gallery free site will become the minimum accepted at one or more link lists.

|couch|

You know - that's not that bad of a concept - I'm going to have to look into the 3 gallery 8 pics minimum concept.

[ponygirl]

You know - that's not that bad of a concept - I'm going to have to look into the 3 gallery 8 pics minimum concept.

I hope you're not kidding, that sounds interesting. Both from a design point of view and a tease the surfer point of view. Be a good shakeup :D

[virgohippy]

You know - that's not that bad of a concept - I'm going to have to look into the 3 gallery 8 pics minimum concept.

Ya know, numberous times I've thought, "you know what self" - that's what I call myself - "it would be wonderful if we could do three galleries with the same total pics, and everyone would still love us."

As long as it's an option, either 2 galleries of 12 minimum, or 3 galleries of 8 minimum, you got my vote. |thumb

[virgohippy]

I hope you're not kidding, that sounds interesting. Both from a design point of view and a tease the surfer point of view. Be a good shakeup :D

Exactly what I was thinking. :)

[jonnydoe]

Great feedback from all on this one! I was looking at it primarily from the perspective of time management... I would think that it would be positive for SEO as well. The 3 X 8 rule would take care of that "too much" issue. Maybe I am backwards but when I surf for Free Sites I typically hit the last gallery first and only go to a previous gallery if the last was really good...I'm not a very good prospect for porn though ;-)

[MrYum]

You know - that's not that bad of a concept - I'm going to have to look into the 3 gallery 8 pics minimum concept.
That is a damn interesting idea actually |thumb

Maybe I am backwards but when I surf for Free Sites I typically hit the last gallery first and only go to a previous gallery if the last was really good...I'm not a very good prospect for porn though ;-)
Sure you are! Let me know if you need some links :D

[jonnydoe]

I've think I've seen 'em all MrYum ;-)

[Mateusz]

I have no problem with 3 galleries but I'm sick of these all gay 5-gallery (24pics each) freesites.
I've banned dozens of domains but there are more comming my way every fucking day