Will major SE's Index This Page?

[Doug E]

http://gallerycollector.com/galleries/UncleWang/Uncle_Wangs_Asian_Babes&sample=y

Is the code this page is written indexable.

Of course I would have to do a better keyword job and include meta tags, but assume this is done.

[Bill]

Sure. Only one dynamic operator in the url, should be no problem.

[Doug E]

Thanks Bill :)

[Halfdeck]

If there are any uncommon words in there, like "wang", then the _ may prevent the url from matching in search queries, at least in Google. You can see this going on also in Google image, where a search for "sandra bullock nude" will match sandra-bullock-nude.jpg but probably won't match 434w_sandra_bullock_nude.jpg. It'll partially match 345w_sandra-bullock-nude.jpg but Google will consider 345w_sandra to be one word.

[neveremail]

If there are any uncommon words in there, like "wang", then the _ may prevent the url from matching in search queries, at least in Google. You can see this going on also in Google image, where a search for "sandra bullock nude" will match sandra-bullock-nude.jpg but probably won't match 434w_sandra_bullock_nude.jpg. It'll partially match 345w_sandra-bullock-nude.jpg but Google will consider 345w_sandra to be one word.
why is 345w_sandra considered one word?

[Halfdeck]

why is 345w_sandra considered one word?

Right now, Google doesn't regard _ as a space. To G, 345w_sandra looks like 345wxsandra. If the embedded word is an obscure word/name, Google won't recognize it embedded in the string.

[neveremail]

Right now, Google doesn't regard _ as a space. To G, 345w_sandra looks like 345wxsandra. If the embedded word is an obscure word/name, Google won't recognize it embedded in the string.
Thanks halfdeck.

Good job I have been using - instead of _ then :)