ExploreXXX - new rule - what does it mean?

[Bill]

"16-At your entry page with recips must be only one ENTER link (text link to your galleries!) and no sponsors banners/links. New rule ".

So what does this mean, I find myself wondering?

Just beneath it is this, one of the old instructions:

"-A warning page with a Clear ENTER link with no other Enter links on that Index page."

So, to me it looks like the new rule is saying no ads on the entry page.

Who's reviewing there and what is the review schedule?

[MrYum]

Hope that's a mistake Bill...otherwise wow, that is a bit extreme |dizzy|

Think Ramster sold the site recently though...so who knows what the new owner is up to =/

[plateman]

I think that means no other links on the index of a free site, enter is it..

[Kinky]

if that means what it sounds like then it is the new nominee for the stupidest fucking link list rule ever... say bye bye to all of your submitters |waves|

[RawAlex]

I think it may be "no other ENTER links on banners"... but it is truly no banners, well...

Hmm.

Alex

[Useless]

Gets my vote for the most unclearly written new rule. I'm hoping it means other links using the word 'enter'. Otherwise, the new owner needs to pull his head out and smell the roses.

[msanchez]

seems pretty clear to me that its saying no sponsor links on the index Wow thats hardcore

[Ramster]

Let me see if I can get Leo by here who bought the site frmo me to explain. Sounds to me he mean people using banners with ENTER flashing on it. But maybe he can clear it up.

[ArtWilliams]

Could a group of LL owners come up with a common @#$%$& set of rules. Even if your sites says, I adhere to the common set of link list rules found here plus I impose these x number of other restrictions.

---art

[CrazySy]

I removed it from my submit list after it was sold knowing my sites stopped getting listed there and the site is being updated God knows how often.

[stuveltje]

leo aka alex will get it fixed i think, he is the same guy who owns pimplinks and more sites....

[stuveltje]

Could a group of LL owners come up with a common @#$%$& set of rules. Even if your sites says, I adhere to the common set of link list rules found here plus I impose these x number of other restrictions.

---art
you cant demand most linksites have the same rules, its your choise to pick out the ones you submit too, make your right pick:)

[ArtWilliams]

you cant demand most linksites have the same rules, its your choise to pick out the ones you submit too, make your right pick:)


I agree but most link lists have MANY of the same rules and it would be great if those could be standardize. --- art

[stuveltje]

I agree but most link lists have MANY of the same rules and it would be great if those could be standardize. --- artwell you should think that but where is mention at the most common linksites that your site have to be 800 width, example, submit to gg, hoes , penis bot and some other big linkites and your site is not 800 width, you will be declined at gg but not at hoes i believe, there will always be an rule which makes your site declined at some linksite, just put the right linkbacks of linksites together on one page and your save:)

[Useless]

So, in the end he's just saying that the only time he wants to see ENTER on the index is for the free site's ENTER link. I'm pretty sure we all agree with that one. I don't like to see the word enter used in any other circumstances either. He just needs a translater. ;)

[Torn Rose]

He just needs a translater. ;)

He's the not only one who needs a "translator" |waves|

[stuveltje]

and i like my chinese dutch english writing:D so i dont need an translator.......oh ik vergat te vertellen dat een smilie die zijn tong uitsteekt wel handing is, Stu----->>> steekt nu haar tong uit naar Torn :D so who needs an translator now :D

[Useless]

He's the not only one who needs a "translator" |waves|Dick:D

[RawAlex]

Linklist rules are like building sites for certain browsers... you can "max out" on certain features that will make things work for one group, and fail for the other, or you can settle on settings that satisfy most everyone. Under 800, 20-30 pics, 3 sponsor links per page, decent layout, no ugly screencaps from videos... nothing opening in new windows... all html in the same folder... you are pretty much good to go everywhere.

You live out on the edge, not everyone will go there with you.

Alex

[neveremail]

Nah I think this guy is really on to something.

Fuck it when I make my Link List I'm not allowing any sponsor links. Who pays for porn anyway :)

[MadMax]

"16-At your entry page with recips must be only one ENTER link (text link to your galleries!) and no sponsors banners/links. New rule ".

So what does this mean, I find myself wondering?

Just beneath it is this, one of the old instructions:

"-A warning page with a Clear ENTER link with no other Enter links on that Index page."

So, to me it looks like the new rule is saying no ads on the entry page.

Who's reviewing there and what is the review schedule?

Whoa, and people say I'm strict.... :D

[wels]

Hi,
Can you check my site:

http://hqpornforum.com/hosetv/pantiehose/

and tell me why I'm not listed.

Thanks

[Blnt]

My word about standart submit rulez ;),
I think that most link lisk has similar rules and you dont have to worry about getting listed here and not listed there too much, if anyone want to spread some link list into groups then there is always possibility to make some groups with smilar rules and still go on with no problems. What I think is if your content isnt overused, site is easy to navigate, dont have screen caps, fits 800 width and dont have huge blind links on warning page you will get listed almost everywhere :)
The new rule... I hope it is mistake otherwise ill start submit galleries ;)

[Fonz]

oh ik vergat te vertellen dat een smilie die zijn tong uitsteekt wel handing is, Stu----->>> steekt nu haar tong uit naar Torn :D so who needs an translator now :D
Torn if you need one :D

[Jel]

Has anyone got an acceptance mail since the new owner took over?

[Fonz]

Has anyone got an acceptance mail since the new owner took over?
Now that you mention it, nopez.
He probably is a little behind because of the changes that had to be made with the takeover.

[Ramster]

Hi,
Can you check my site:

http://hqpornforum.com/hosetv/pantiehose/

and tell me why I'm not listed.

Thanks

You are not listed because you are hosted at hqhost and that host was banned.

As far as reviews I think he is way behind yes. I noticed for the longest time it was updated on Sept 11 and now I see the next update is dated for Sept 26 so there is a big gap.

[plateman]

Has anyone got an acceptance mail since the new owner took over?
I did the other day

[Jel]

Thanks Guys,

I guessed the new owner may have been caught up in changing linkcodes and generally getting up to speed. I'll keep an eye out for those lovely acceptance emails :)