Linked Headers OK?

[stablehand]

Hi,
I've seen different takes on this, and gotten varying advice, so please let me know if you would accept a header linked to sponsor, or consider it blind.
Thanks.

[DangerDave]

Short answer = No

DD

[Chop Smith]

stablehand, by saying "header", are you referring to the title of the free site?

[stablehand]

Originally posted by Chop Smith
stablehand, by saying "header", are you referring to the title of the free site?

A banner at the top.

[Greenguy]

I'd have to see an example - if it's the one DDave is thinking, I'd say it's a bad idea. If it's just a banner up top, that should be fine.

[stablehand]

Originally posted by Greenguy
I'd have to see an example - if it's the one DDave is thinking, I'd say it's a bad idea. If it's just a banner up top, that should be fine.

This is the banner (not the title) i wanted to link
http://www.free-cum-porn.com/blonde-pigtails-pussy/teen-pussy/index.htm
but i linked the bottom banner instead, not sure if that's any better.

[Greenguy]

I'd probably allow that like you have it (without a shitload of text above or below it that's linked up as well)

[xxxjay]

Depend on how blind they look - maybe yes, maybe no. If they link to the root of your site - it would be a lot better than linking to the sponsor.

It would then have a navigation funtionality rather than just a blindlink.

[Fonz]

Originally posted by stablehand
This is the banner (not the title) i wanted to link
http://www.free-cum-porn.com/blonde-pigtails-pussy/teen-pussy/index.htm
but i linked the bottom banner instead, not sure if that's any better.
You probably should put a <br> or <p> tag between your title and that banner. On a resolution higher than 800x600 it shows up a bit messy.

Seems like lots of people are forgetting to start new lines these days. |sad|