View Full Version : Linklist owners I have a question...the answer could benefit you!
Joshua
2004-08-18, 07:40 PM
I'm starting a new project...nothing revolutionary...but I'll be building chunks of freesites and galleries...all tied together to be very se friendly and share traffic accross the tgp's and the ll's...
Each chunk consists of 5 freesites comprised of 2 galleries at 15 pics each, those 10 galleries are submitted and return traffic to the freesites and conversely the freesites share traffic amongst eachother with a footer that interlinks the index pages.
Each index page carries the necessary recips.
My question is...does the interlinking bother you if they all carry your recip?
Would you list a freesite that has a footer linking to all the index pages of the 5 freesite chunk?
Remember each carries your recip and each is also linked to from the galleries that get submitted to the tgp's...
In terms of the effectiveness I expect they will have in the se's I see this as more than beneficial to you...what are your thoughts?
And if you will accept them, please post here or contact me via icq#103-771 or hoax@pornotronic.com
Your response and consideration is greatly appreciated.
-Joshua
You get 3 links per page. These can be 3 links to sponsors, 3 links to your own stuff or any combination of links, but 3 links is the max.
Joshua
2004-08-18, 08:45 PM
I knew I couldn't convince you...|sad|
Anyone else? Having just pk's and iceicebaby's recip's on my pages won't get me very far...
RawAlex
2004-08-18, 08:56 PM
then you aren't going to get far.
Remember, PK will only let you have two sites listed (unless they are gallery pages only), so she won't get you far either.
Your plan is good, but it shouldn't involve link sites you don't own (there is a tip in there!).
Alex
Joshua
2004-08-18, 09:15 PM
Originally posted by Joshua
I knew I couldn't convince you...|sad|
Anyone else? Having just pk's and iceicebaby's recip's on my pages won't get me very far...
PK approved it...
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?threadid=342861&s=
I think the benefit here is that the links always go to a page with the ll's recip on it...additionally the traffic going to these clusters from sources other than ll's should more than offset the links...I would hope...
Greenguy
2004-08-18, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by RawAlex
(there is a tip in there!) :D
Joshua
2004-08-18, 09:30 PM
Originally posted by Joshua
I knew I couldn't convince you...|sad|
Anyone else? Having just pk's and iceicebaby's recip's on my pages won't get me very far...
I had to dig a bit...hehe...
Conversely...my stubborn nature won't let me give up just yet...even if I only get a few ll's to agree that'll work for me. And hey...that's what mirrors are for.
Ghost&Lliandrin
2004-08-18, 09:31 PM
Adult Gatekeeper would list you because we don't have a specific limit on the number of outgoing links. We just ask that you keep it within reason and we judge each site individually. If the sites are good quality you wouldn't have a problem with us.
:)
Lliandrin
Joshua
2004-08-18, 09:32 PM
Cleo,
Will you expand that to 4 when 2257 becomes an issue? All my pages carry a 2257 link...
Joshua
2004-08-18, 09:34 PM
Originally posted by Ghost&Lliandrin
Adult Gatekeeper would list you because we don't have a specific limit on the number of outgoing links. We just ask that you keep it within reason and we judge each site individually. If the sites are good quality you wouldn't have a problem with us.
:)
Lliandrin
Thanks a ton! You're on the list!
EDIT:is it just me or is adult gatekeeper down?
RawAlex
2004-08-18, 09:37 PM
2257 is NEVER counted as a link, provided that the page linked is in fact a 2257 page, and isn't used for anything other than that purpose. I have already seen one or two people using 2257 links to share PR or redirect traffic. How quaint.
I read the GFY thread. PK said "I don't see anything wrong with it" very different from "yes yes". Build a few sites and submit them, and see how far they go.
Again, if you are talking galleries, well, who knows?
Alex
Joshua
2004-08-18, 09:42 PM
Originally posted by RawAlex
2257 is NEVER counted as a link, provided that the page linked is in fact a 2257 page, and isn't used for anything other than that purpose. I have already seen one or two people using 2257 links to share PR or redirect traffic. How quaint.
I read the GFY thread. PK said "I don't see anything wrong with it" very different from "yes yes". Build a few sites and submit them, and see how far they go.
Again, if you are talking galleries, well, who knows?
Alex
If you have time I'd appreciate it if you could let me show you what I got going...even if only for a second opinion...that is if you can take time out of your day from fending off pissed submitters...lol...
|bananna|
Ok I'm probly wrong usually am hehe.
You want to take a footer and place it at the bottom of each gallery page
.
The footer on the gallery has lets say 15 recips to linklists(just a number hehe).
And that way the linklists would have 45 or 3 recips each x5.
Thats more then 3 links on a galley like they all make as a rule,due to the header at the bottom.
I can see that would really become a problem in the long run.
Like I said I could be wrong and probly am haha
Ghost&Lliandrin
2004-08-19, 02:04 AM
Adult Gatekeeper is working fine for me. If you have any trouble getting it could you let me know? Not sure what the problem is. Thanks!
Lliandrin
Joshua
2004-08-19, 02:56 PM
Originally posted by Joshua
If you have time I'd appreciate it if you could let me show you what I got going...even if only for a second opinion...that is if you can take time out of your day from fending off pissed submitters...lol...
|bananna|
No...the footer is on the main and index pages. It consists of 5 links each linking to the index page of another freesite in the chunk. So all 5 sites are interlinked. Additionally, the galleries carry a single link at the bottom that link to the index of the corresponding freesite. So when the galleries get submitted to the tgp's they feed traffic to the pages that carry the ll's recips. Additionally, when I build the mirrors I'll make sure I'm only interlinking pages that carry the same recips.
Originally posted by Joshua
Cleo,
Will you expand that to 4 when 2257 becomes an issue? All my pages carry a 2257 link...
What Alex said about the 2257 link. I also do not count the exit link as long as it goes to a non adult domain.
neticule
2004-08-19, 03:08 PM
i doubt your going to get very far with that many out links. i would suggest having 1 outlink to another site. I.E. free site #1 links to "bonus free site #2" 2 links to 3, 3 to 4, 4 to 5, and 5 to 1.
that way they all link together but it only takes one out link to do it... i think this is the only way you will get listed with such a project, which is a good idea in my opinion, crosslinking rocks :P
Joshua
2004-08-19, 03:59 PM
Thanks for your input guys and gals...
On a side note...
I can't get to...
http://www.youngcherrys.com/hunter/submit.htm
or
http://www.adultgatekeeper.com/
I'm sure the problem is on my end...but I can't figure out why.|angry|
Mishi
2004-08-19, 05:08 PM
Originally posted by Ghost&Lliandrin
Adult Gatekeeper would list you because we don't have a specific limit on the number of outgoing links. We just ask that you keep it within reason and we judge each site individually. If the sites are good quality you wouldn't have a problem with us.
:)
Ditto.
(Sorry for hijacking your post - I'm due for lunch and can't think on my own at the moment.... |dizzy|)
Tommy
2004-08-19, 08:13 PM
if they are clean I will link em. But not on subdomains
ie:
freesite.domain.com
Ghost&Lliandrin
2004-08-19, 10:00 PM
Hmmm, don't know why you can't get to Adult Gatekeeper. It looks kinda ugly now cause we're in the middle of a huge update and the css has changed a bit. It shouldn't be down at all though. Also we don't list subdomains either. Just thought I'd throw that in there. :)
Kezza
2004-08-19, 10:27 PM
Joshua do you have an example of your sites?
Also... I sent her a PM
Dylan
2004-08-20, 11:44 PM
|waves|
we accept them
:D
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.