|
|
|
From: Pancho
Dog "...Despite General Gonzalez’ efforts at reviving the concept of “secondary producers” in the most recent version of regulations in support of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, the concept is not supported by the statute itself. The only case addressing the issue, Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 807 (10th Cir.1998), held that the “secondary producer” requirements of the regulations to be unconstitutional. We rely on that holding, and further decline to violate the privacy of the performing artists by disseminating private data when not required to do so by law...". What does this mean? What changes then can we expect from PanchoDog,
regarding the 2257 regs and are you compliant? Can we promote your sites, that contain sexually
explicit content? If you have any questions regarding our policy, please do not hesitate to ICQ, Skype, Email or call, or have your attorney do so. One last note: We strongly suggest you sign up to the free speech coalition. If you are considering the adult business are part of your future, it is extremely important to be a part of this very important organization: Learn more and Visit their site here: http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ Thank you all for your continued support and promotion of the Pancho Dog
sites. |